I respect your opinion, MR, but here's where it falls apart for me: It's not only his words that I base my conclusion on. It's also the way these incidents continue to be handled. If he truly understands who the enemy is but just can't publicly declare it, does that mean he must go along with the FBI agent (who refused to record a Muslim) not only not being fired, but
promoted? There are more cases, but that's a particularly egregious violation of the national security trust. What I'm saying is that the actions behind these somewhat under-the-radar cases seem to perfectly match the beliefs that are being publicly espoused.
MM
I don't have an answer for you, MM. The handling of the traitorous FBI agent has been utterly unacceptable.