Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. defends Iraq contracts, EU demands U.N. role
Reuters | 3/27/03 | David Evans

Posted on 03/27/2003 5:17:43 AM PST by kattracks

U.S. defends Iraq contracts, EU demands U.N. role

By David Evans

BRUSSELS, March 27 (Reuters) - As Britain and the United States thrash out plans to rebuild a post-war Iraq, a senior U.S. official on Thursday defended the awarding of relief and reconstruction contracts to American firms.

The European Union meanwhile insisted the United Nations must be "in the driving seat" in post-conflict Iraq, in contrast to Washington's plans for a more limited U.N. role.

Alan Larson, U.S. Under Secretary of State for Economic and Agricultural affairs, on a fence-mending trip to Europe after bitter divisions over Iraq, insisted the Bush administration's primary aim was helping the Iraqi people.

British companies have complained of being left out in the cold by U.S. aid and reconstruction guidelines, which say primary contracts must go to U.S. firms, which can then hand-pick subcontractors from anywhere in the world.

"I am surprised there should be any concern over contracts," Larson told journalists in Brussels after meeting EU officials.

The motivation behind contract awards was to restore disrupted electricity supplies, open up ports and ensure that water was safe to drink as quickly as possible, he said.

"It's the responsible thing to do," he said. "These contracts are about how we help the Iraqi people effectively."

Britain, Washington's only major military partner in the war, has lobbied the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) after it became clear that firms such as Amec(AMEC.L), Balfour Beatty (BBY.L) and Carillion (CLLN.L) could lose out.

Calling EU-U.S. ties a "high maintenance relationship," Larson implicitly criticised the way French President Jacques Chirac had rebuked EU candidate countries which publicly backed the U.S. hardline stand on Iraq.

"Most troubling was to see some member state leaders and Commission officials dressing down other EU countries and accession candidates simply for agreeing with the United States on Iraq, as if that was somehow 'un-European'," he said.

UN HUMANITARIAN ROLE

In Athens, Greek Prime Minister Costas Simitis, whose country holds the rotating European Union presidency, insisted the United Nations must play a pivotal role in post-war Iraq.

"Return to international law will be achieved if the United Nations take on a central role," Simitis told parliament. "The United Nations must be in the driving seat."

Greek government spokesman Christos Protopapas told reporters: "Iraq is not the protectorate of anyone else, it does not belong to some who think they can manage it as they like."

EU states want the world body to have wider powers than the United States appears willing to accept.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair was due to meet U.S. President George W. Bush on Thursday, seeking to put the United Nations at the centre of post-conflict reconstruction efforts.

Larson said Washington was working for a U.N. resolution giving Secretary-General Kofi Annan access to funds in the oil-for-food programme to provide humanitarian support to Iraq.

"The United Nations has an important role," he said.

He said rebuilding Iraq was one area where the United States and Europe should now focus cooperation, but he had not come to Brussels armed with a blueprint.

Damage to the Iraqi economy had "not just happened in the last seven days," he said.

"This is not mainly about repairing the damage from the present military campaign, one that is being conducted with great restraint," he said. "The destruction we will be trying to repair is the result of 20 years of oppressive rule."

03/27/03 08:11 ET


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: irrelevant

1 posted on 03/27/2003 5:17:43 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Don't need any French Carpetbaggers.
2 posted on 03/27/2003 5:20:09 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
To the victor go the spoils!
3 posted on 03/27/2003 5:20:31 AM PST by Highest Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
SURE!!!!!! Let the U.S do the dirty work and then WE can reap the rewards. If any of these governments truly cared about Iraq we wouldn't be at war right now , they are pathetic.
4 posted on 03/27/2003 5:26:12 AM PST by cocopuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The UN waived their right to any post-War Iraqi spoils, as well as the Euro Union. Their pro-Saddam stance should not be rewarded after the US and the UK clean Iraq of Saddam

This is more United Nazi and Euro Nazi fascism. Their Homocentric weaknesses should not be rewarded.

In fact, the US, UK, and Australia should be able to recoup any expenses from Iraq for the cost of liberation...via sale of Iraqi oil. Of course, the oil mainly should be used to rebuild Iraq, but only US and allied nations should be allowed to run a post-Saddam Iraq
5 posted on 03/27/2003 5:32:46 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Anti-War Protestors: Our Own Home-Grown War Criminals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
We really need to let the White House know that the Frence should not have any role in Iraq after the war.

But the British and others who were willing to stand by us difinately should get to join in.
6 posted on 03/27/2003 5:34:56 AM PST by 429CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The UN is a political fiction created by American madmen Wilson and Roservelt. It' a whole cloth scam designed to destroy the envy of the entire world - the only successful capitalist nation - the united States of America.

Whatever power and authority it pretends to possess can only come from countries who have no economy, and see the opportunity to extort money from inventive and purposeful nations. In brief, the so-called United Nations is a criminal enterprise.

7 posted on 03/27/2003 5:39:10 AM PST by Robert Drobot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 429CJ
Iraq comes 1st........

US-UK come second......

Aussies and Spaniards get some consideration and then maybe the other 40 nations of the willing....

That puts France behind Germany , Russia and Belgium.......lets see, add in the other 30 or so unwilling and somewhere around 85 on the list sits France.....

Not in this life.........
8 posted on 03/27/2003 5:44:17 AM PST by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Those countries complaining should have the right to totally fund the projects on whch they wish to bid. Indeed, the funding should be committed and completely secured before the bidding commences.
9 posted on 03/27/2003 5:48:03 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I say let them (except the French) buy their way in, on a very limited scale that we supervise. No more building bunkers and selling weapons. They can help reimburse the costs of the war. Win-win.
10 posted on 03/27/2003 5:48:22 AM PST by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
F*** the UN - Us, the Brits, and maybe the Aussies ought to spread the wealth between themselves
11 posted on 03/27/2003 6:03:49 AM PST by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I never really thought about this until now, but those U.N. contracts probably contain a lot of international pork for the NGOs, so a lot of NGO execs., worldwide, are mad because they think they will be cut out of the action. Rat politics on the international stage.
12 posted on 03/27/2003 6:19:20 AM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I imagine that bit about Britain not getting any contracts was typical Reuters propaganda. When the chips have fallen, I'm sure Britain, Australia, and Poland will have consideration.
13 posted on 03/27/2003 6:27:18 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson