[SoldiersGirl]

When President Bush said "You're either with us, or against us" I didn't really take it to heart, I thought it was a little too black and white. Awhile later....France, Germany, Russia, China....have opened my eyes to the fact that it really is black or white. Yes or No..with is or not?
Where do we draw the line at who we call our allies?
Remember, I'm a bit new to the political arena, so bear with me..but I'm reminded of the old Hen story...the Hen does all the work baking the bread, without any help...then the rest of the farm wants to eat it. That seems to be what's going on when it comes to rebuilding Iraq.

[Ophiucus]

I think you've got it. There comes times in history where events call people and nations to be on one side or the other. WWII was such a time. Either you stand up against a spreading evil or you help it along.

After this war, we'll many nations like France trying to get in and profit from our sacrifice. Luckily, Bush and Blair are standing firm and will continue to do so.

[VRWC_minion]

When President Bush said "You're either with us, or against us" I

to be exact, he said you are either with us or with the terrorists. IMHO, its not a small difference in meaning.