Skip to comments.
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 8 - LIVE THREAD***
Various
| 3/27/2003
| Me
Posted on 03/26/2003 9:04:14 PM PST by Centurion2000
Good Morning.
This is the Daily Thread of Operation Iraqi Freedom - LIVE THREAD.
It is designed for general conversation about the events of the day. In depth discussion of events should be left to individual threads - but links to the threads or other articles is highly encouraged. This allows us to stay abreast of the situation in general, while also providing a means of obtaining specific information.
Please have mercy on us dial up limited FReepers! Limit the big graphics, post links instead. A breif description of what the graphic is would help:
Special thanks to null and void for keeping these running over the weekend and Monday, to all of you for keeping these threads alive, the AdminMods for their tolerance, mhking for the video links, and, of course, Belly Girl...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqifreedom; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,701-2,720, 2,721-2,740, 2,741-2,760 ... 3,861-3,867 next last
To: Cboldt
People are still dying in Iraq and they are already tripping over their corpses to cash in on Iraq? The question is: "What do France and lawyers have in common?"
To: pitinkie
Even so he seems biased. He made me and Shep both ill last night. Poor Shep tried to get him to say something reasonable, but all he spouted was Iraqi propaganda.
2,722
posted on
03/27/2003 2:36:43 PM PST
by
Krodg
To: SoldiersGirl
I think you've got it. There comes times in history where events call people and nations to be on one side or the other. WWII was such a time. Either you stand up against a spreading evil or you help it along.
After this war, we'll many nations like France trying to get in and profit from our sacrifice. Luckily, Bush and Blair are standing firm and will continue to do so.
To: Dog
Now where did this additional 15,000 troops come from II Marine Expeditionary Force, through Jordan.
That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it. :-)
2,724
posted on
03/27/2003 2:38:17 PM PST
by
TonyInOhio
(Now begins the Pax Americana)
To: Dog
Now where did this additional 15,000 troops come from. And, another 100,000 coming, on the way to Iraq, where the first 90,000 came from.
The coalition made phenomenal accomplishments in the last week, and did so with less than half of the "man on the ground" power available. THis shows how serious our determination is, and reinforces GWB's promise that there will be no half-measures.
To: Dog
I think they were already enroute and there was a division that was supposed to deploy through Turkey that had to be rerouted through the Suez and around the Arabian penninsula.
To: Ophiucus
Excuse me for having to ask, it's just that I don't exactly know how the UN works...
Bush now has the right to Veto Frances bid to get into Iraq for the rebuilding right? And, if this is correct, then how did he gain that vveto power? and if it's wrong...pretend I never asked :-)
To: TonyInOhio
Ahhhh!
Tony that is a division size force that just popped up...
2,728
posted on
03/27/2003 2:40:07 PM PST
by
Dog
To: ninenot
"What do France and lawyers have in common?" They both stink?
To: Ophiucus
Soldiers also left from Ft Hood on tuesday...they may be getting counted in.
To: Dog
When I think of the Iraqi Central Command, I can't help but think of the joke about Custer saying "where did all these efing Indians come from?" They will not know what hit them.
To: SoldiersGirl
There are 5 countries which have a veto on the Security Council: Britain, USA, France, Russia, and China. These are the old allies of WWII.
ANY one of the members with this power can veto a resolution. That is how the Security Council was set up.
The other members of the Security Council have their seats on a rotating basis. That is why Cameroon is on the Security Council right now but Japan is not.
To: SoldiersGirl
Not a problem -ask away :-)
Basically, when the UN was formed, there was a general council which any nation could join and a security council which had the "big dogs" of the day: the Allies (US, Britain, France, etc.), USSR, and China were permanent members. The permanent members can block any resolution brought by the general council.
To: retrokitten
I don't recall that. I was multi tasking at the time. I just remembered she acted like creating WMDs was no big deal. I thought that was bizarre.
2,734
posted on
03/27/2003 2:44:13 PM PST
by
Jaded
(Close the BORDERS and the CHECKBOOK!!)
To: Dog
The sky.
2,735
posted on
03/27/2003 2:44:49 PM PST
by
Jaded
(Close the BORDERS and the CHECKBOOK!!)
To: SoldiersGirl
To: Jaded
It all sounds like good news to me.
2,737
posted on
03/27/2003 2:46:55 PM PST
by
Krodg
To: Ophiucus
It only takes one veto to block a resolution? You would think I'd know this considering all thats been going on. I was under the assumption that the problems we had with the UN were because 2 countries were going to say no about Iraq. France and China.
But a single no is powerful enough? Or, will it take Blair and Bush to both veto?
To: Krodg
Richard Perle has resigned. Breaking on PMSNBC.
2,739
posted on
03/27/2003 2:47:49 PM PST
by
Straight Vermonter
(http://www.angelfire.com/ultra/terroristcorecard/index.html)
To: Straight Vermonter
Richard Perle has resigned. Sounds like Sy Hersh's New Yorker article may be true after all.
Or is somebody annoyed that Perle's assurances about what would happen in an Iraq war have not panned out?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,701-2,720, 2,721-2,740, 2,741-2,760 ... 3,861-3,867 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson