Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diddley
Wow. That's...shocking. The Abrams is such an overwhelming force, its difficult to imagine one being damaged, much less taken out. A modern day Bolo.

Impressive that the ammo-explosion containment buffers saved the crew, though!
7 posted on 03/25/2003 10:43:02 PM PST by OOPisforLiberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OOPisforLiberals
The Abrams is such an overwhelming force, its difficult to imagine one being damaged

Every tank ever built is very easy to destroy if you can attack it from behind, below (large mine) or overhead. If those areas were as well armored as the front, they wouldn't be able to move.

Haven't quite seen the media panic and hand-wringing I expected for the first Abrams losses.

Anyway, point is, tanks are FAR more vulnerable than people think...even the best tanks in the world (Abrams and Challenger). Particularly in more built up areas. In a city fight infantry is protecting tanks more than tanks are protecting infantry.

Nice thing about tanks is that they can be destroyed and the crew survives...it's routine for a tank unit that loses 1/2 its tanks in combat but only have 10-15% of their men killed.

9 posted on 03/25/2003 11:19:29 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: OOPisforLiberals
Impressive that the ammo-explosion containment buffers saved the crew, though!

I agree.

13 posted on 03/25/2003 11:26:36 PM PST by Diddley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson