Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cpforlife.org
VACCINES FROM ABORTION THE HIDDEN TRUTH

From:

Children of God for Life http://www.cogforlife.org 2130 Catalina Drive, Clearwater, Florida 33764 (727) 538-5558

THE DARK HISTORY

For over thirty years pharmaceutical companies in this country have been producing vaccines derived from tissues of aborted fetuses, a fact that was brought to light when several prominent Catholic newspapers published articles on the morality of using the vaccines. The trouble began when a new law in St. Louis County, Mo. required food handlers to obtain the Hepatitis-A vaccine for employment. When the source of the vaccine was revealed, many principled individuals objected and with good reason. And as this information has continued to become more and more public, a large number of physicians and parents are highly troubled by the ethical issues involved.

During the Rubella epidemic of 1964, some doctors advised exposed pregnant women to abort their children. The resulting virus strain developed was known in the science world as RA/27/3, where R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27th fetus tested, 3=third tissue explant. There were actually 26 abortions prior to finding the right “species” with the active virus. The vaccine was then cultivated on the lung tissue of yet another aborted infant, WI-38. WI-38 (Wistar Institute 38) was taken from the lung tissue of an aborted female infant at 3 months gestation in the 1960s. A second human cell line, MRC-5 was derived from a male at 14 weeks gestation in the 1970s. They were used to cultivate the weakened virus strains of several diseases to produce immunizations. These two human cell lines cultivated in the lab continue to provide an ongoing source for many widely used vaccines.

NO OTHER SOURCE

Three of the vaccines were produced solely from abortion and to date, there is no other source available to treat their diseases. The vaccines are:

CHICKEN POX HEPATITIS - A RUBELLA

Following is the information on each vaccine, its clinical name and the pharmaceutical company producing them.

CHICKENPOX: VARIVAX/VARICELLA Uses both MRC-5 and WI-38 human cell lines and is produced by Merck & Co.

HEPATITIS-A: “HAVRIX”, “VAQTA” Uses MRC-5 human cell lines and is produced by SmithKline Beecham and Merck & Co.

HEPATITIS A-B: “TWINRIX” New combo vaccine uses MRC-5 human cell lines and is produced by SmithKline Beecham (NOTE: Hepatitis-B alone is NOT “tainted.”)

RUBELLA: MERUVAX, MMR Uses WI-38 human cell lines and is produced by Merck & Co. NOTE: MMR PROVIDES SIMULTANEOUS VACCINATION FOR MEASLES-MUMPS-RUBELLA. ANY VACCINE WHICH COMBINES WITH RUBELLA, IE, RUBELLA-MUMPS, (BIAVAX) RUBELLA-MEASLES (MR-VAX) USES THE SAME ABORTED FETAL CELLS. MERUVAX IMMUNIZES FOR RUBELLA ONLY.

OTHER “TAINTED” VACCINES

There are some vaccines that have been manufactured from these same aborted fetal cell lines, (MRC-5 and WI-38), however there are also alternative sources used in their production that do not come from abortion. Following is the information on each vaccine, its clinical name, the alternative “untainted” source and the pharmaceuticals producing them.

“TAINTED” VACCINES (continued) MUMPS MEASLES POLIO RABIES

MUMPS MUMPSVAX (UNTAINTED) Merck & Co.: Uses the cell cultures of a chicken embryo. 1-800 422-9675

MEASLES ATTENUVAX (UNTAINTED) Merck & Co: Uses the cell cultures of a chicken embryo. 1-800 422-9675

POLIO POLIOVAX (TAINTED) Aventis-Pasteur: Uses MRC-5 human cell line. IPOL (UNTAINTED) Aventis-Pasteur: Uses monkey kidney cells. 1-800-822-2463 ORIMUNE (Oral Dosage - Untainted) Aventis-Pasteur: Uses monkey kidney cells. 1-800-822-2463 RABIES IMOVAX (TAINTED) Aventis-Pasteur/Connaught: Uses MRC-5 human cell line. RabAvert (UNTAINTED) Chiron Inc.: Uses chick embryo. 1-800 244-7668 (Pacific Time)

Your doctor can order these untainted versions in single doses by calling the 800 numbers above.

NOTE: As new vaccines are being developed Children of God for Life will monitor their production. If the vaccine you are questioning is not listed here, as of the release date listed below, it is not derived from aborted fetal tissue. As the new smallpox vaccines become available, we will update you with the name of both the tainted and untainted versions, which will be produced by both Acambis and Acambis-Baxter. (Information Release Date: January 2002)

Moral Problems

Many ethicists have tried to justify the use of vaccines derived from aborted fetal tissue when there are no alternatives available. They make a legitimate argument that we have a moral obligation to protect our children and society from life threatening diseases.

Those opposed to abortion, find the use of these vaccines morally objectionable. The aborted child has already had his/ her human dignity severely violated. The callous practice of using these babies' tissue amounts to further violation of the dignity of the unborn person. Some think using such vaccines constitutes complicity in the evil of abortion; others argue that it is morally permissible in the absence of alternatives. Still others argue, “Well, the abortions were performed over 30 years ago, so what's the big deal?"

In our culture, unfortunately it is a big deal, because researchers are still exploiting aborted fetuses and are lobbying to create embryos strictly for the purposes of research. They use the existence of vaccines from aborted fetuses to justify their proposals. At the Senate subcommittee hearings held April 26, 2000 on Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Senator Harry Reid compared the use of future products taken from destroyed human embryos to the benefits of the Polio vaccine. The University of Nebraska used the same argument in defending its' experiments on fetal tissue “donated” from abortion facilities. But perhaps most disturbing was President Bush's use of these vaccines to justify his decision on funding embryonic stem cell research in August 2001. He compared the use of these destroyed human embryos to the development of the chickenpox vaccine.

If we accept the status quo now, what argument against further research and products in the future could be legitimately argued? It is certain that scientists and pharmaceutical companies will pursue an avenue of research they perceive to be perfectly acceptable to the public. We have a moral responsibility to promote, request and use those vaccines that do offer alternatives

And remember the Rubella epidemic mentioned on the previous page? Scientists did not have to use aborted fetuses in order to isolate the Rubella virus for creating a vaccine. They could have done exactly what the Japanese did: they swabbed the throat of an infected child and grew the virus on non-fetal cell lines, producing a vaccine that unfortunately, is not currently available in the United States. There is no doubt that American scientists wanted to use fetal tissue and this simply gave them the opportunity and excuse to do so. The same holds true for those who are pursuing embryonic stem cell research: there are alternatives and they should be utilized.

Summary

Unless all our actions show respect for human life, we will be less able to oppose the actions of those who discount the inviolable dignity of embryonic and fetal life. The most important fact is that vaccines can and must be made from sources other than tissues from aborted fetuses. We proved it with our smallpox campaign in November 2001 by demanding an untainted alternative - and we got it! Had we remained silent, millions of Americans would be forced to use a life and death vaccine, grown on the MRC-5 aborted fetal cell lines. Perhaps then, the real complicity lies not in whether we choose to use these vaccines, but rather that we do nothing about them.

The Campaign for Ethical Vaccines

Is Now On-Line!

Sign our petition as we demand that our pharmaceutical manufacturers produce safe, effective vaccine alternatives that are not derived from aborted fetal tissue. For more information, visit our website:

http://www.cogforlife.org Children of God for Life

Or write to us at: Children of God for Life 2130 Catalina Drive, Clearwater, Florida 33764 (727) 538-5558

Produced by Children of God for Life With Grateful Acknowledgement For The Assistance of Dr. Janet Smith, PhD, University of Dallas

- Copying Permissible -

10 posted on 03/25/2003 10:19:39 PM PST by cpforlife.org (“My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge.” Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cpforlife.org
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke 1770
15 posted on 03/25/2003 11:00:45 PM PST by cpforlife.org (“My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge.” Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: cpforlife.org
Bumped and bookmarked ... thanks for the concise data. My regards to Dr. Smith.
18 posted on 03/25/2003 11:05:35 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: cpforlife.org
All you need is one cell to grow a line. Why should abortion be required to get it, even if it is desired to have it from a fetus? Why couldn't it be picked up out of the amniotic sac fluid, or as a by product of the new technique of fetal surgery?
22 posted on 03/26/2003 5:16:44 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: cpforlife.org; American in Israel; HiTech RedNeck; Ronaldus Magnus; cyborg; GovernmentShrinker
First, I don't like the source of these cell lines and support using other cell lines. For one thing, any legitimization of even one elective abortion is wrong. For another, I think it would be healthier to use non-human cell lines and that it's dangerous to use 30 year old, homogeonous lines. An infection in these lines would be a catastrophe for the nation's ability to produce vaccines since there is no push to find alternate sources. In other words, the status quo is that these lines are cheap compared to the animal alternatives, legal and available, so why change or do research?

But.....

The lines are old - from single, named abortions from the 60's and 70's. (New tissue samples aren't used from new abortions. But, that doesn't mean some researchers aren't trying to find their new line from new specimens from today's abortions.

Influenza vaccine isn't produced in human cell lines. It's produced in chicken embryos (fertilized chicken eggs.)
http://www.influenzaconnection.com/manufacturing.html
Go to "Fluzone Influenza Virus Vaccine product insert."

There is a fine point of difference between these cell lines and embryonic stem cell research (very fine line). None of these children were created and killed or even killed for the purpose of creating the vaccines. In embryonic stem cell cloning or somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning of embryos the child is created for the express purpose of killing him or her in order to harvest the crop of cells.

32 posted on 03/26/2003 8:26:28 PM PST by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson