Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC's own man blasts his bosses over 'bias'
The Sun ^ | Mar 25, 2003 | TREVOR KAVANAGH

Posted on 03/25/2003 9:19:33 PM PST by Reagan is King

THE BBC was last night sensationally condemned for “one-sided” war coverage — by its own front line defence correspondent.

Paul Adams attacks the Beeb for misreporting the Allied advance in a blistering memo leaked to The Sun.

And he warned the BBC’s credibility is at risk for suggesting British troops are paying a “high price for small victories”.

On Monday, he wrote from US Central Command in Qatar: “I was gobsmacked to hear, in a set of headlines today, that the coalition was suffering ‘significant casualties’.

“This is simply NOT TRUE. Nor is it true to say — as the same intro stated — that coalition forces are fighting ‘guerrillas’.

“It may be guerrilla warfare, but they are not guerrillas.”

Adams’ memo was fired off to TV news head Roger Mosey, Radio news boss Stephen Mitchell and other Beeb chiefs.

It adds stunning weight to allegations that BBC coverage on all its networks is biased against the war.

In one blast, he storms: “Who dreamed up the line that the coalition are achieving ‘small victories at a very high price?’

“The truth is exactly the opposite.

“The gains are huge and the costs still relatively low. This is real warfare, however one-sided, and losses are to be expected.”

The BBC has come under attack for describing the loss of two soldiers as the “worst possible news for the armed forces”.

One listener asked: “How would the BBC have reported the Battle of the Somme in World War I when 25,000 men died on the first day?”


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bbc; bbcexposedbias; britishfriends; casualties; ccrm; iraqifreedom; lamestreammedia; mediabias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: Brian Allen
Well said!
81 posted on 03/26/2003 8:13:42 AM PST by Reagan is King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Hi wirestripper,
you big lug.
I've sent some wires and done a little stripping myself. Yes, getting the old paint off that dresser was a chore!

Luv & Kisses,
Michelle

82 posted on 03/26/2003 8:19:13 AM PST by sonofatpatcher2 (Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
I'm all for the embed's now. I wasn't so sure before the war because I was worried everything would be told with a liberal spin but it now it's turning out to be the opposite.
83 posted on 03/26/2003 8:20:29 AM PST by Reagan is King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
We are seeing this new perspective by some media, and this new relationship paying huge benefits.

I looks as if "we" were right after all.
How many times have you heard, "If (insert reporter's name here) has such a problem with what's going on, maybe he should pick up a gun and stand a post!"

It seems as if this is what has happened and it is having the desired effect. Bravo.


84 posted on 03/26/2003 8:26:29 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: zook
I noticed on your homepage you're a professor at Penn State serving a sabbatical in Taiwan. It's great to hear how the war is being replayed around the world . . . especially from a voice I can trust. I don't know your politics, although being a FReeper might give it away a bit (LOL), but I'd rather hear from a semi-leftist American abroad than one of the BBC correspondents.

Thanks for sharing and if you have a Ping list please add me to it.

LOL. As an aside, I usually check my spelling for any word over five letters because I type quite poorly. When looking up "correspondent" on Atomica -- a great free service, by the way, for any who need to quickly look up a word and don't want to leave their current URL -- here's what I found . . .

"I'd get into a room and disappear into the woodwork. Now the rooms are so crowded with reporters getting behind-the-scenes stories that nobody can get behind-the-scenes stories."
–On his method of reporting, recalled on his death, 15 May 86
Theodore H White

85 posted on 03/26/2003 8:27:53 AM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: driftless
Like Rush said - genius!
86 posted on 03/26/2003 9:34:49 AM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2
LOL! Hmmmmmmmmmm..............................
87 posted on 03/26/2003 9:40:13 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe; Bloody Sam Roberts; BallandPowder
Today, there was a reporter giving a dispatch via satellite phone to MSNBC. He was professional, and decked out in desert BDUs and gear. From the side, a hand gently patted him on the back, and he smiled and nodded. The reporter then said:

"The first sergeant says we have to move now (OK John..I'll wrap it, let's go!). We are moving now, so I have to go."

You are all correct---this experience is already having a profound impact on newsrooms and cable outlets--as well as print media. Did you read the story about the reporter in Newsweek who almost got killed, and then decided to stay with a unit from now on? He even said his photographer was "rescued by fellow Americans."

This is a far cry from the journalistic traitors that claimed in interviews they would allow Americans to die before they would "compromise their news sources."

When this war is over (and it will end, I assure you, with our victory) these men and women who were embedded will return to New York, Los Angeles, London, and Washington DC and tell stories at cocktail parties to the ones who stayed behind....and I bet 99% of them will not tolerate allegations by their fellow newsies that our brave American, British, and Aussie troops were out there killing civilians with wanton glee or mongering for Iraqi blood.

They will look at the liberals in the newsroom and say: "Wrong! I was there."

88 posted on 03/26/2003 10:39:03 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
I am remembering Jim Lacy from Times mag. He was the reporter embedded for CNN at Pa camp in Kuwait. Within hours of the attack, he was refuting the anchors that he (whatever his name is, I forget) did not do it out of resentment, but because of his Muslim religion.

This, despite denials by the military brass, is panning out to be true.

I hope the embedded reporters signed a contract that they could not be fired when they return to their jobs. LOL
89 posted on 03/26/2003 10:51:14 AM PST by Conservababe (I calls it like I sees it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
Well ... if these media suddenly realize what their true purpose is, they will be exposing all sorts of democrat messes. However, I hope the GOP is aware that some of our own can possibly be exposed also.
90 posted on 03/26/2003 1:32:22 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
For lack of a Fox News internet feed, I've been sporadically watching BBC News 24 online and noticing a leftist bias on the part of some reporters.
91 posted on 03/26/2003 1:36:40 PM PST by k2blader (If one good thing can be said about the UN, it is that it taught me how to spell “irrelevant.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
Pigs are flying. They really are...
92 posted on 03/26/2003 2:46:50 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
bump
93 posted on 03/26/2003 2:48:27 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: geedee
Thanks! I admit freely my poor spelling, especially when in a hurry! I'm one of a handful of conservative Republicans in the College of Education. My lefty friends think I'm hopeless!

Oh, more BBC nonsense today. They're playing big this supposed bombing of a marketplace. They get a professor from Baghdad University on the phone and, of course, he's talking about how this makes Iraqis want to fight the US, blah, blah, blah. Now, they *know* that he's not going to say anything else, because to do so would mean the death of him and probably his family.
94 posted on 03/26/2003 3:52:39 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
Believe it or not, during an interview by PBS NewsHour, a New York Times reporter in Bagdad (Foster, I believe is his name) stated there was much anticipation of the arrival of the American troops by the Iraqi's -- anticipation that they would soon be free from Saddam's regimed. The NewsHour interviewer appeared stunned.

The New York Times reporter was John Burns. He was on again, tonight, on both PBS and ABC. He was astonishing. Tonight on PBS he had reservations on the Iraqi government's contention that a missle caused the civilian casualties in the marketplace, stating the crater did not look like a bomb crater (too small). On CBS he spoke how the civilians on the scene at the marketplace blast treated the western journalist with no animosity, even shaking the journalists hands when they learned the journalists home countries.

We need to learn more about John Burns. He is not your typical New York Times reporter.

95 posted on 03/26/2003 4:17:46 PM PST by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
bump
96 posted on 03/26/2003 9:15:30 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
bump
97 posted on 03/26/2003 10:14:03 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson