To: rmlew
I don't think Neocons favor unlimited and unrestricted immigration (that is more a WSJ position), although most probably favor a substantial influx. Where did that canard come from? Neocons tend to favor a generous amount of legal immigration, since in general it is a great vaccuum cleaner that sweeps in the best and the brightest across the globe. And that strikes me as desirable, plus it tends to mitigate the deleterious effects of an aging population due to relatively low birth rates.
100 posted on
03/26/2003 7:41:26 PM PST by
Torie
(w)
To: Torie
There are substantial costs to immigration, both economic and cultural.
We would do better to restrict immigration, Americanize immigrants, and stop the government anti-natalist education programs.
113 posted on
03/26/2003 11:47:06 PM PST by
rmlew
("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson