To: Conservababe
As a dedicate Freeper, (gulp), and as much as I hate it, CNN has better coverage of the war in Irag than any other network (gulp).
They are wired internationally like AT&T is for international communications.
Never thought I would be watching CNN.
17 posted on
03/25/2003 6:22:41 PM PST by
oldtimer
To: oldtimer
You can gulp like a guppie all you wish, but Fox and their Sky news has beat CNN hands down.
21 posted on
03/25/2003 6:26:00 PM PST by
Conservababe
(I calls it like I sees it)
To: oldtimer
CNN the BEST..........CNN is still blocked on my TV so I only know past performance, but I will stick with FOX news and an occasional comercial break trip to MSNBC. I notice that FOX NEWS is leading the pack in war coverage also. They are doing fine by me.
29 posted on
03/25/2003 6:32:05 PM PST by
PISANO
To: oldtimer
Respectfully, Sir, there's no way CNN beats Fox News...unless you just have an affinity for self-induced nausea and anti-war protest coverage. I'll give 'em one thing though...at least the anchors have figured out the nuances of air raid sirens. I got a real kick out of that "breaking news" the first three days, when I could still stomach their reporting style.
I've been delivered. No more CNN "opiate for the masses" coverage for me.
To: oldtimer
"As a dedicate Freeper, (gulp), and as much as I hate it, CNN has better coverage of the war in Irag than any other network (gulp)."
I think the FACTS, as they unfold, cannot be refuted by the big networks. CNN's resources don't appear in evidence, to me, as giving them an advantage.
I switch between channels. I will watch BBC, to get what their cameras and reporters can cover.
For intelligent viewers, it is easy to separate editorial positions, from "raw" reporting.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson