Replies

"It is a reflection of your ideology that you would reflexively accuse him of lying when there is evidence to support his agreement with the host on this point."

The host said that there was dancing in the streets of New Jersey, I said that there's no truth to that, you say that somehow my ideology reflectively makes me lie, then offer up as "proof" an unfounded report of some unidentified people celebrating IN A MOSQUE?

Perhaps you need to examine your need to perpetuate unsubstantiated reports, and try to understand the difference betwqeen dancing in the streets, and celebrating in a Mosque.

"The host said that there was dancing in the streets of New Jersey, I said that there's no truth to that,"

Actually you said Spencer was lying.

"you say that somehow my ideology reflectively makes me lie,"

Actually I didn't say anything about you lying at all.

"then offer up as "proof" an unfounded report of some unidentified people celebrating IN A MOSQUE?
Perhaps you need to examine your need to perpetuate unsubstantiated reports, and try to understand the difference betwqeen dancing in the streets, and celebrating in a Mosque."

I offered you evidence that something went on in NY/NJ that night to support his not challenging the host on this point. There are numerous reports of odd goings-on that night, with varying degrees of plausibility. Spencer has never written anything I could find about 9/11 celebrations (yes, I checked) and I think you are being reflexively ideological to accuse him of lying for saying one word in response to the host in the midst of a rapid-fire discussion. Why don't you ask him, next time he's on, if he actually believes there were celebrations in NJ on 9/11, and if so, what is his evidence, before accusing him of lying?