Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
"I don't know. But, if they're not locking them up, then you don't have a thing to worry about, do you?"

If this is expanded to allow information not involving terrorism gained from secret wiretaps/email survelliance to be passed onto other law enforcement agencies, what will your position be? Do you think that isn't going to be proposed later on (or sooner?), if only for the children??
20 posted on 03/24/2003 5:42:34 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: WoofDog123
If this is expanded to allow information not involving terrorism gained from secret wiretaps/email survelliance to be passed onto other law enforcement agencies, what will your position be?

It already is. Child pornographers and pedophiles are regularly nailed this way.

That's a good thing.

Take 'em one at a time.

If there were some way to keep drunks from driving, I'd be for anything that would accomplish that. Anything.

24 posted on 03/24/2003 5:51:09 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson