To: AnnaZ
I don't necessarily have a problem with Nicole's remark...
To: danneskjold
Me, neither. I'm teasing.
5 posted on
03/24/2003 2:02:17 PM PST by
AnnaZ
To: danneskjold
I don't either. the fact that the Oscars went on demonstrates that we believe that our troops are capable and in good hands. And Art IS important.
9 posted on
03/24/2003 2:03:39 PM PST by
Violette
To: danneskjold
Unfortunately, I would date her even if she was liberal. In her case I would make the ultimate sacrifice.
To: danneskjold
The art of Afghanistan and of Iraq is under a greater threat from the terrorists and dictatorial regimes, than the bombs from the US. Just think of the restrictions on freedom of speech in that part of the world... imagine painting or writing something that doesn't fall in line with what the government permits? As Rushdie about being persecuted for art. I think he would agree with Kidman's quote. Art is important. He almost perished because of his artistic expression.
15 posted on
03/24/2003 2:05:50 PM PST by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Lurking since 2000.)
To: danneskjold
Because art is important." I am torn between descriptives: Sad, clueless, unimaginative, deceptive, dim, unprepared, dishonest.
Although, low on the offensive scale given the current level of Hollywood expression.
To: danneskjold
I don't necessarily have a problem with Nicole's remark... Me neither, other than the implication that what Hollywood produces has anything to do with art.
69 posted on
03/24/2003 2:43:32 PM PST by
Ditto
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: danneskjold
Neither do I. We conservatives should give credit to those (few) celebrities who resisted the urge to denounce the war or Bush. Kidman's saying "Art is important" was benign.
To: danneskjold
It would depend on how you 'took' her remark.
At it's most innocent, we go on with life even though there is a war, because to not do so, is to not have anything to fight for.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson