Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Heyworth
That's a pretty limited view of art.
 
I've always believed that great art imitates life. It takes a fleeting moment of beauty and immortalizes it, secures it, so that it can be experienced by others.
 
Is that better?

145 posted on 03/24/2003 4:16:32 PM PST by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: AnnaZ
Is that better?

A bit, but it still locks art to the reflecting the natural world. I think that the aesthetic experience can be more broadly based than that. But now we're getting to the area of taste. I think a Jackson Pollock painting is amazing. You might think it's just a bunch of randomly splattered paint.

150 posted on 03/24/2003 4:29:09 PM PST by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson