Skip to comments.
U.S. Finds Suspected Iraq Chemical Plant
Associated Press ^
| March 23, 2003
| Matt Kelley
Posted on 03/23/2003 5:59:12 PM PST by AntiGuv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: AntiGuv
Gee maybe the sign out front said "Baby Milk Plant" and that's why the UN inspectors missed it--I think the Iraqis had that sign left over from the last Gulf war.
To: marajade
The "inspectors" were never meant to find anything of significance..
The goal of the U.N. was to STALL and DELAY until the French, Germans, Russians and their allies the Islaminazis - could bring America to her knees with horrible acts of terrorism against us.
This war in Iraq should be thought of as...the beginning of WWIII.
This sides have been identified..
The enemy has "played their hands"..
Our friends have identified themselves...
WE SHOULD LONG REMEMBER THESE PAST FEW MONTHS......
Time to be strong and resolute.
Semper Fi
22
posted on
03/23/2003 6:21:29 PM PST
by
river rat
(War works......It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
To: AntiGuv
Ok, AP finally reporting! This is HUGE!
BUT: what indications are there that this factory was being used to manufacture chemical ?
Well, for one -- why else would it be guarded by the military and two generals? And why would it be camouflaged if it were not manufacturing chemical weapons?
Folks, this is great news, leaving egg on the faces of France, Germany, Russia and China, the Demonrats, the anti-war protestors . . . It will be fun to watch 'em all backpeddle like the cheese-eating surrender monkeys they are!
Finally some good news after a rough news day.
23
posted on
03/23/2003 6:21:38 PM PST
by
bdeaner
To: New Horizon
Use Blix to test the chemicals on himself. If he dies they are real.
To: BamaFan69
"Hanz would have found it if given more time, likely around 2010".....J Chirac.
25
posted on
03/23/2003 6:25:35 PM PST
by
Froggie
To: AntiGuv
Another baby milk factory?
To: Froggie
I think 2010 is a little generous... Maybe if we send him to North Korea today, he could start looking for nukes...
To: AntiGuv
Anyone think that Tom Daschole will have an excuse for this? Will he accuse Bush of "planting" this? Will he follow the Baghdad line? Whose side is he on anyway?
To: bdeaner
"If the plant is confirmed as a chemical weapons factory..." That is not a very strong statement. I have followed this all day, from the Jerusalem Post to Fox and now to AP. Be careful not to read more into this than the facts allow. I do hope we nail down some chemical weapons facilities and personnel ASAP, but this is NOT conclusive yet. I hope we find them before some are used, which I think could happen in the next 24-48 hours, because of our proximity to the capital. I don't want our guys to get sucked in and then #$%^ on.
29
posted on
03/23/2003 6:51:50 PM PST
by
RKV
To: RKV
FNC is backing down a bit on this now.
To: AntiGuv
Its a 100 acre baby milk plant.
To: bdeaner
And why would it be camouflaged if it were not manufacturing chemical weapons? Well.....since America is notorious for bombing aspirin and baby milk factories...plus an occasional Red Cross facility or two... they had no choice. /sarcasm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson