To: sinkspur
I thought the banning of Catholicguy was unwarrented, and I think the same about banning askel. I'll miss her. And it just goes to show you that if your not into republican groupthink your opinions won't be allowed to be expressed here, as if this stupid forum is going to have any sort of outcome in the real world in regard to Bush or whoever. Agree with her or not, she made for lively debate. That was what I liked about this place 3 years ago. It was fun to get into long throwdowns with people you didn't agree with, but still liked and respected. Not much fun anymore. Sheeeet...is that a village mob with torches I see...?
176 posted on
03/23/2003 4:32:30 PM PST by
JMJ333
To: JMJ333
Catholicguy was another who didn't understand the clear demarcation between acceptable dissent and the unacceptable. He baited people into flamewars - and got burned for it.
179 posted on
03/23/2003 4:36:44 PM PST by
Chancellor Palpatine
(Paleocons, the French and the UN - Excusing corrupt power mad dictators for decades)
To: JMJ333
I thought the banning of Catholicguy was unwarrented, and I think the same about banning askel. CatholicGuy was banned for trashing George W. Bush in a manner I've never seen. Askel5 was banned for asserting that our soldiers don't deserve the protection of the Geneva Convention.
You can still get into throwdowns with Mormons, and with RnMomof7 on the religion thread.
Why would you want to court anti-Americanism on this website?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson