Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Many US casualties in Nassiriya battle; Footage of POWs, including woman, shown on Iraqi TV
Al Bawaba ^ | 23-03-2003, 16:47

Posted on 03/23/2003 9:10:39 AM PST by Lessismore

On Sunday afternoon, the Qatar-based television al Jazeera broadcast Iraqi TV, showing a videotape of at least 10 US POWs, including one female soldier, and a room with some 15 bodies of US troops. The live broadcast included also a footage of a battle field area in the southern Iraqi city of Nassiriya with additional corpses of US soldiers as well as struck military equipment.

The videotape has also shown how the Iraqis investigate the American POWs. The prisoners were questioned on air and gave their names, military identification numbers and home towns.

The chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force conceded that there were American soldiers missing, but said that there were fewer than 10 troops unaccounted for in southern Iraq.

U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld warned Sunday it was possible that Iraqi forces had taken U.S. prisoners, saying there were unaccounted soldiers and journalists in the combat zone.

He noted that under the Geneva Conventions governing prisoners of war, "It's illegal to do things to POWs that are humiliating to those prisoners."

Earlier, it was reported that U.S. Marines battled for control of Nassiriya, taking "significant" casualties in a fight to open a route north to Baghdad, military officials said.

Reuters quoted military officials as saying the Marine battalion spearheading the fight had suffered significant casualties in the battle.

A total of 11 U.S. soldiers were captured after taking a wrong turn, and 50 military personnel have been wounded in the massive firefight in Nassiriya, ABCNEWS reported Sunday.

According to the report, 11 soldiers, maintenance workers, had taken a wrong turn outside the city on a mission to carry out repair work. They were traveling in a column of vehicles that came under heavy fire, including from an Iraqi tank. The capture was observed by other forces nearby.

The firefight at Nassiriya blocked an advance by U.S. forces, who had earlier reported securing two key bridgeheads to enable them to cross the Euphrates and strike northwards toward the Iraqi capital.

Reuters said there was heavy U.S. helicopter traffic over the area, and that hundreds of U.S. military trucks and armored personnel carriers had stopped their advance.

Iraqi Information Minister Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf told a news conference in Baghdad that foreign invaders headed to Nassiriya had been "taught a lesson they will never forget." "We have placed them in a quagmire from which they can never emerge except dead," he said. (Albawaba.com)


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: casualties; kia; nassiriya; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-246 next last
To: JMJ333; sinkspur
I am not informed enough on the Geneva convention to make comments on it, so will you explain it to me before I make a decision on whether she is being anti-American?

Oh puleeease...just how stupid do you think we all are?

201 posted on 03/23/2003 6:22:37 PM PST by Neets (Mess with me and you'll be introduced to my big ole can of MOAB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
You know me well enough to understand that I take the views of the Pope seriously.

The Pope is trying to prevent a Christian vs. Muslim crusade. That's why he's saying what he's saying.

Calling the war a "crime against humanity" was a bit over the top, though.

George W. Bush is doing the right thing here, and I suspect the Pope won't lose any sleep over this war.

I miss sitetest's posts, but getting in a snit over the banning of someone who went off on the President the way Catholic Guy did is misplaced.

202 posted on 03/23/2003 6:26:10 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
I have the thread. I read it. He got a little out of hand. But nothing that I haven't seen my old rival harbour do a hundred times over. ;)
203 posted on 03/23/2003 6:26:23 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Neets
I don't know? How stupid are you? While you're at it, you may as well hit your itchy trigger finger on the abuse button for me too and have me banned for questioning your vitriol.
204 posted on 03/23/2003 6:29:20 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
He got a little out of hand.

Comparing Bush to Hitler is more than a "little out of hand."

I suspect CatholicGuy's a Buchananite, though I've never confronted him on it.

205 posted on 03/23/2003 6:31:33 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
Get real....go read up on the GC and see if you agree with her on how our guys and gals who are being held as POW's should be treated...

FWIW, she knew it was inevitable she'd be banned eventually...she did it to herself...I just helped speed the process a little...

But don't believe me....after all I am the only one here educating you about Askel.
206 posted on 03/23/2003 6:33:05 PM PST by Neets (Mess with me and you'll be introduced to my big ole can of MOAB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Certainly Bush is not Hitler in terms of the war. In regard to eugenics and genetic engineering, I'd say America is on par with nazi Germany. Not saying the war has anything to do with that though. I sent you a freepmail, and I see you answered part of it with your last post. Thanks.
207 posted on 03/23/2003 6:36:48 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
The Geneva Convention specifically bans the parading of POWs in front of cameras, or filming their interrogation.

It also bans the execution of POWs (as if that needed to be encoded anywhere).

Askel said that the United States shouldn't expect to be covered by the Geneva Convention when it went against the major signatories of that convention (that's the UN) in going ahead with this war.

That's reprehensible, IMO. The UN exhibited cowardice, and will be embarrassed after this war ends.

Askel also said, during our incursion into Afghanistan, that the Taliban were unfairly demonized; they were, after all, against abortion, drugs, and pornography.

Askel's a very angry young woman, and she's taking it out on the country.

208 posted on 03/23/2003 6:39:30 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
That's reprehensible . . .

Not only reprehensible, but wrong. The laws of war apply to all armed conflicts--whether they are blessed by the ignoble, feckless UN and its cheese-eating surrender monkeys or not.

Askel5's brain is free-wheeling in empty space. LP is a good place for her.

209 posted on 03/23/2003 6:42:56 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
In regard to eugenics and genetic engineering, I'd say America is on par with nazi Germany.

Where is the US engaged in "eugenics"? Or genetic engineering, for that matter? The Congress, and Bush, are trying to ban cloning and any stem cell research on embryos beyond those already in labs.

I don't agree with you. At all.

210 posted on 03/23/2003 6:43:30 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
I can't be sure of that, but I would tend to think so. She was a BIG Keyes supporter, and the two often seem to go hand in hand.
211 posted on 03/23/2003 6:44:41 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet ("Hey Dad...speaking of driving...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Askel said that the United States shouldn't expect to be covered by the Geneva Convention when it went against the major signatories of that convention (that's the UN) in going ahead with this war.

If that is indeed what she said then I would disagree with that statement.

Askel also said, during our incursion into Afghanistan, that the Taliban were unfairly demonized; they were, after all, against abortion, drugs, and pornography.

This is, in a nutchell, her baby. Nothing is more evil to her than the current culture. The taliban are evil SOBs, no doubt about it. Her point was, though, that they haven't they killed 45 million of their own in the womb, or harvested out untold amounts of humans like crops of corn for they cells. Which is the greater evil? What they did to their women or what we do to ours? We are a peaceful people, never harming our neighbors. We only harm our own. Her argument has merit on that level.

But why banning? Why not just knock her down in the arena of ideas if her ideas are so wrong. I always considered her a great contributor to our catholic caucus and will miss her and will pray for her.

Anyway, thanks for the explanation sink. I'm getting offline and going on a walk. Probably won't be back until Eastertime. Have a fruitful lent.

212 posted on 03/23/2003 6:56:14 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Where is the US engaged in "eugenics"? Or genetic engineering, for that matter? The Congress, and Bush, are trying to ban cloning and any stem cell research on embryos beyond those already in labs.

So much for me walk. :)

Put in a search at google for genetic engineering+latest research. Check out the University of Wisconsin. Check out the NIH. Check out the human-pig chimeras. Materialist athiest science is running the show in this country...running the culture of atomism. Peter Singer, Richard Dawkins and Stephern Hawking aren't exaclty backing away from their views these days. <

213 posted on 03/23/2003 7:02:16 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
Materialist athiest science is running the show in this country...

What does this mean? I just want to make sure you're not turning into a Bircher.

214 posted on 03/23/2003 7:05:28 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
LOL! And share company with the likes of Todd Brendan Fahey?? Not a chance! Its just an observation after reading a lot from the people at the discovery institute and people who combat those who have this fixation with playing God and manipulating nature. I didn't mean it conspiratorially. I just meant that we are no longer a Christian nation in terms of worldviews, we are now materialists and their beliefs drive culture.
215 posted on 03/23/2003 7:10:32 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Lessismore
Sayonara Askel5. Thanks moderators for banning that account.
216 posted on 03/23/2003 7:13:24 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
What was the topic of this thread again? I lost track after reply 31. :-)
217 posted on 03/23/2003 7:46:28 PM PST by Nita Nuprez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
In time you may learn prudence and circumspection -- virtues of middle age, so different from the reckless, passionate valor that's the virtue of youth.

I doubt it, though -- to you, both a blessing and a curse; for us, a bitter misfortune to have lost you. I salute you.

AVE ATQUE VALE.


218 posted on 03/23/2003 10:13:38 PM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
But nothing that I haven't seen my old rival harbour do a hundred times over. ;)

That's what makes this place so interesting. Let's hope in the coming week cooler admin heads prevail and perhaps Askel5 is permitted back. Her zeal should be checked, but eliminated? She made interesting and useful contributions as passionate people do, we can forgive a lack of circumspection, no? V's wife.

219 posted on 03/24/2003 5:05:48 AM PST by ventana (as usual, I am in the kitchen and the heat is about to get turned up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: ventana
No, we can't - not on something like this. Her deranged blatherings had gotten even goofier than before, and this last one was over the top.

Passion is one thing, deep psychosis is another.

220 posted on 03/24/2003 6:11:45 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine (Paleocons, the French and the UN - Excusing corrupt power mad dictators for decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-246 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson