To: Aaron0617
They are not saying chemical WEAPONS factory.
They are saying chemical factory.
They are now saying that there are vats of chemicals but that is to be expected at a chemical factory.
MSNBC
4,866 posted on
03/23/2003 5:07:15 PM PST by
Poser
To: Poser
FNC Pentagon Reporter say it was WEAPONS facility, not just a Chem factory
To: Poser
Then why in the hell would they try to dress it up so it couldn't be seen by satellite photos? PMS is just upset because they didn't break it and the Pentagon talks to Bret Baier first.
To: Poser
If it is a chemical factory with no ill intentions...there would be no need to camoflouge(sp?) it from aerial photos
4,877 posted on
03/23/2003 5:09:24 PM PST by
Green
To: Poser
So why would they camo a regular chemical factory? Why would there be a General in command of it?
4,888 posted on
03/23/2003 5:10:30 PM PST by
Straight Vermonter
(http://www.angelfire.com/ultra/terroristcorecard/index.html)
To: Poser
Did MSNBC ask about the camouflage? Did they point it out?
If it was just an innocent chem. plant why camouflage?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson