Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
Except that you don't have a problem with people who instigate flame wars as long as they agree with your position.

Who can instigate a flame war, if one doesn't want to play? One can respond, or not, in kind, or not.

The devil doesn't make us do it.

There's a whole lot of feigning going on in this forum lately.

Not to mention irony.

I ended up "buring" myself? Would that be "burying" Toothy?

"Burning." I was attempting some wordplay with "flame war," but I botched it, and no one understood what I was saying. Sorry about that.

Revisionism is your trick, as is jumping to conclusions, and casting aspersions.

Perhaps I should spend more time casting assertions.

You're big into forum posting guidelines, aren't you Toothy?

That goes right along with forum decorum...you know, like making sure that you include the person you're talking about in the To: portion of your post.

I was flagged to this thread after leaving it alone, and was responding to a charge, trying to do so in such a way as to not reopen the whole matter.

In hindsight, I think I fumbled on that count and I should have pinged you. I apologize for the omission.


BTW, I got your link on the Fiqh Council, thanks. I was looking over the State Department doc, and doing a little clicking around to familiarize myself with them, when things went the another way the other night.

They don't seem to be as high profile as some other Islamic orgs. Are they Wahabbi? What is their influence?




1,449 posted on 03/24/2003 7:47:09 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1438 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
Hey, Sabertooth, I ran across this and thought you might enjoy it:

Some defend iSLAM because they are nothing more than quavering cowards.
Some defend iSLAM because they think it makes them sound superior.
Some defend iSLAM because they think their moral relativism will protect them.
Some defend iSLAM because they think appeasement will protect them.
Some defend iSLAM because they are ignorant of iSLAM’s consistent bloody swath through human history.
Some defend iSLAM because they like its fight against Christianity.
Some defend iSLAM because they like its fight against the Jews.
Some defend iSLAM because they like its fight against that other guy’s religion.
Some defend iSLAM because they are sleeper elements of a fifth column in our country.
Some defend iSLAM because it is their faith and they will be murdered by their ‘brothers’ if they leave.
Some defend iSLAM because they are misogynists and the cult gives them what they want.
Some defend iSLAM because they are as primitive as it is.
Some defend iSLAM because they like its fight against America (because their turd-world nations are so far beneath America).
Some defend iSLAM because it’s the popular thing to do.
I swear, some of them would defend the Aztec cannibals or the Thuggee cult if those religions of peace were alive today!

At any rate, iSLAM intends to be the death of America and freedom and every other religion on the planet.

None survive when freedom fails
Good men rot in filthy jails,
While those who cried “Appease! Appease!”
Are hanged by those they tried to please.

1,453 posted on 03/24/2003 9:37:24 AM PST by Thorondir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1449 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson