Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Discussted
Women should not serve directly in military operations. They are only usefull in "support" roles. Otherwise, they are just in the way of our brave men in uniform.

These four look capable to me.
5 posted on 03/22/2003 3:24:33 PM PST by www.corvettewave.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: www.corvettewave.com
Why? Because two of them are cute?
64 posted on 03/23/2003 11:21:06 PM PST by wardaddy (G-dspeed our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: www.corvettewave.com
Now take a minute and think about what would happen to those four "capable women" if they were shot down over Iraq.
111 posted on 03/24/2003 5:26:44 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: www.corvettewave.com
It is sheer ignorance to pretend as if women are men. They are women. Iraqi soldiers would just love to get their hands on these lovelies.
How about we send your daughter into combat.
I don't want to hear any griping either. And I expect lots of flag waving by you when her face is paraded across the screen with that look in her eye that makes you realize what a crappy father you would be for cheering her into this situation.

There's NO NEED to send females into combat. Without a need, it becomes nothing more than self-serving delusion to do so.

If you are so for sending women into combat, I suggest you open up a recruiting kiosk on your front lawn, and be sure to post plenty of images of what really happens to a female when caught by the likes of a drooling Iraqi.
118 posted on 03/24/2003 8:46:44 AM PST by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson