[ALS]

I don't see how men getting raped in times of war is a reason to let women be raped.

My premise is that there is NO NEED to put women in combat.
Appeasing short haired dykes in flannels is not a need.

Some wish to divert the issue to "women are capable" at this or that. That's a great discussion, but if we are talking about putting women in situations where they can be captured and abused, the other side loses.
The fact that they feel a need to divert or reframe the issue shows just how wrong they are.

[Servant of the Nine]

My premise is that there is NO NEED to put women in combat. Appeasing short haired dykes in flannels is not a need.

My premise is that other than in the case of a 17 year old daughter, it's not your call to make. They don't belong to you.

Your ad hominem attacks on wimmin in the armed forces as short haired Dykes shows your real motive clearly. If you are kinda wussie in real life, strong wimmin are kinda threatening, aren't they?

So9