Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mistakes paved way to this day
New York Daily News ^ | March 20, 2003 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 03/21/2003 10:35:59 PM PST by Gamecock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Per convention:


1 posted on 03/21/2003 10:35:59 PM PST by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
But the question of how this man stayed in power for so long will continue to perplex historians for a long time to come. The answer is, he had a lot of help.

Yes he did. Another factor, if I am not mistaken, and I could be, but I think Saddam believed in severe amounts of gun control.

2 posted on 03/21/2003 10:40:50 PM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Gamecock
It's good that Ann has the fortitude to point out Republican mistakes -- and Lord knows we made them.

This whole mess could have been avoided if people in Washington had turned off CNN and the "highway of death" and let the Generals on the ground finish the job.

Ignoring a problem doesn't make it go away as anyone older than five has learned. Eventually you have to face it. Now we are and the result is going to be the same as it could have been over a decade ago.

The only difference is the thousands of dead Iraqis killed by Saddam that could/would still be alive if we had continued on to Baghdad then.
4 posted on 03/21/2003 10:46:41 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wackyforwesties
It feels like Ann's, but is pretty flat.
5 posted on 03/21/2003 10:48:09 PM PST by gcruse (Democrats are the party of the Tooth Fairy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
(I'm probably going to wish I were in Baghdad after I post this, but. . .) I really don't like Ann Coulter. I mean, sure, I look at her and it's instant wood, but it's not enough. (Brief digression: I haven't lived in the US for 7 years and don't get her on my TV package here.) I saw her on TV back home a couple of years ago and really thought she fit all of the usually vapid liberal stereotypes. Conservatives are mean, coldhearted, reductionistic. When they trot out all this garbage about Rush and many others I find it absurd. Her book SLANDER sucks, too. Sure I know most of it is true and all, but it's crybabyish. Many have done it much better. (and now I repair to my bomb shelter)
6 posted on 03/21/2003 10:53:09 PM PST by bucephalus (Saddam Hussein Sleeps With the Camels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bucephalus
You're wrong in your overall assessment of Coulter, but she can overstep the bounds of propriety at times. However she is a political warrior and not afraid to ruffle feathers. Slam conservatives all you want, but try to enunciate a few talking points. What do you actually believe in?
7 posted on 03/21/2003 11:04:36 PM PST by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
The reason this does not read like an Ann Coulter piece is because it's a Stanley Crouch piece! I realize it's easy to mix them up, so I'm posting a picture of Stanley to avoid future snafus.


8 posted on 03/21/2003 11:06:03 PM PST by Dahoser (Saddam's last job...capacity testing Depends...he overflowed it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
The New York Daily News is under the impression that Stanley Crouch wrote this. So, per revised convention:


9 posted on 03/21/2003 11:06:55 PM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bucephalus
gentle slap....All Ann has tried to do is point out hypocrisy, ocassionally she whines....saying if it is good for you it must be ok for me....it is tounge in cheek
10 posted on 03/21/2003 11:07:39 PM PST by mylife (Hit 'em Hard and Hit 'em Fast!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Uh. This is an article by Stanley Crouch, not Ann Coulter.
11 posted on 03/21/2003 11:16:55 PM PST by BrooklynGOP (...speaking of dumb....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caesar Soze
LOL ... yeah, I always confuse the two! :-)


12 posted on 03/21/2003 11:28:59 PM PST by WOSG (Liberate Iraq! Lets Roll! now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
I have always heard that most homes in Iraq have firearms.
13 posted on 03/21/2003 11:33:45 PM PST by halfdome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
But the question of how this man stayed in power for so long will continue to perplex historians for a long time to come.

I think the 'history' regarding Iraq needs a lens that goes back a little further in time than Bush Sr. Like perhaps back to a time marked by the names Jimmy Carter, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlevi, and Ayatollah Khomeini.

14 posted on 03/21/2003 11:43:04 PM PST by Monitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monitor
France
15 posted on 03/21/2003 11:44:22 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bucephalus
Her book SLANDER sucks, too. Sure I know most of it is true and all, but it's crybabyish.

I agree. Facts is facts, but it comes across an agonizing read1 and its shrill tone is more fitting a Lib than of what Ms. Coulter is capable.


1 with all the footnotes2

2 see Slander by Ann Coulter3

3 an otherwise terrific conservative voice4

4 see 1
16 posted on 03/21/2003 11:52:20 PM PST by Chummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
Watch your language, there are Ladies present!... Call them frogs.
17 posted on 03/21/2003 11:55:24 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
How did this man stay in power for so long? Because the French, the Germans, the Russians, the Chinese, and the UN enabled him and circled the wagons around him.
18 posted on 03/22/2003 12:01:15 AM PST by laz17 (Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Beg pardon.
19 posted on 03/22/2003 12:01:56 AM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bucephalus
Becephalus [Oxhead]

You need a little more experience of her. She is very impressive in person; refreshingly blunt. She can come off as harsh when paired with a weasely worded opponent from the liberal side, which is why many do not like her.

She also has green eyes like ray guns; very high energy level.

Regards,

20 posted on 03/22/2003 4:13:37 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson