To: ztiworoh
As between US legislature and President Bush, Bush was granted the power by the legislature, and he satisfied all requirements of the grant of authority promulgated by Congress.
Technically, it is not a declared war.
What practical difference does the formal stature make?
29 posted on
03/21/2003 9:28:57 PM PST by
Cboldt
To: Cboldt
In the eyes of the law it could make a difference, there is a valid legal argument since technically a state of "war" only exists with congressional approval; its all a question of interpretation, thus do the rules apply to all armed conflicts, only declared wars, armed conflicts with legislative approval but not backed by a war resolution... all about the interpretation
39 posted on
03/21/2003 9:30:40 PM PST by
ztiworoh
To: Cboldt
I resolution was clear. What does it have to say to be a technically declaration of war? "We Declare War"?
Sounds as useless legally as going through the UN for 12 years.
42 posted on
03/21/2003 9:31:06 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Victory for the Iraqi People)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson