To: OPS4
That was not Saddam and it was taped in my opinion. That doesn't make sense. A pre-taped message by Saddam would make sense. A live message by a Saddam double would make sense. But why would Saddam have a message pre-taped by one of his doubles?
107 posted on
03/20/2003 9:05:07 AM PST by
steve-b
To: steve-b
But why would Saddam have a message pre-taped by one of his doubles? If Saddam were killed/injured in the attack, they might have got a double to do the speech, but they wouldn't have let him do it live -- no control. It may have been taped 20 minutes before broadcast, but they'd tape it to make sure the double didn't screw up.
121 posted on
03/20/2003 10:34:45 AM PST by
algol
To: steve-b
Because I believe he could have used doubles and left the country days ago and has this image as the psyops front end that we have been trying to bomb and have tracked for over a week.
I guess its far fetched to think we could be on a wild goose chase hu?
Ops4 God Bless America!
134 posted on
03/21/2003 7:15:14 AM PST by
OPS4
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson