I tried a search. This was probably posted earlier today, but I couldn't find it.
To: TheHeterodoxConservative
They forgot to mention only 1000 to 5000 innocent civilians died and very few Americans. I hate it when writers are liers.
2 posted on
03/19/2003 11:49:01 PM PST by
Angel
To: TheHeterodoxConservative
How about this question as long as you are making up questions for their prejudicial effect:
"Would you favor or disfavor an attack on Iraq that would cost as many as 10,000 Iraqi deaths, if that attack would prevent a future terrorist attack on the United States costing as many as 1,500,000 American deaths?"
3 posted on
03/19/2003 11:51:25 PM PST by
John Valentine
(Writing from downtown Seoul, keeping an eye on the hills to the north.)
To: TheHeterodoxConservative
Where was this guy when polls said people supported President Clinton?
To: TheHeterodoxConservative
"Michael Gartner has been editor of newspapers large and small and president of NBC News" Proof that there's no Liberal bias in the news media. I fart in his general direction.
To: TheHeterodoxConservative
"Michael Gartner has been editor of newspapers large and small and president of NBC News. In 1997, he won the Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing"
enough said....
9 posted on
03/20/2003 1:03:31 AM PST by
2penguins
(some cultures should be lost forever)
To: TheHeterodoxConservative
Amusing isnt' it....to prove his point, Gartner has to dis his own USAToday polls. But then, nothing's sacred ( or too hypocritical), when there's an opportunity to bash Bush.
But the most telling point is how far the lefties in the media will go to explain away reality and insult the intelligence of Bush supporters. We must be stupid, right?
13 posted on
03/20/2003 1:14:19 AM PST by
YaYa123
(thanks for the confirmation!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson