[sakic]

They can only survive in the context of a heterosexual society. Thus, we can live without them, and they can't live without us. Thus we can regulate their behavior, and because their behavior is uniformly negative and destructive to society (higher health costs, child molestation, etc.) we should.

There were numerous assertions that you made that I disagree with but I've decided to address just the one that I have copied here.

Handicapped people would also fall into the group of those that could not live without "us". Presumably this means that we have the right to regulate their behavior. Is this your stance?

[HumanaeVitae]

Handicapped people would also fall into the group of those that could not live without "us".

Handicapped people do not willfully engage in anti-social behavior. Handicapped people do not choose to be handicapped. Homosexuals choose their lifestyle. On the contrary, we should do everything to care for those whom circumstance has dealt a "bad card". However, homosexual men, who have between 500-1,000 sex partners in their lives, are not 'victims of circumstance'.