Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan; Protagoras
Protagoras wrote:
Oral sex with your wife would be defined as sodomy and if you think that it should be criminalized you are on a different level than me.

To which you replied:
When the act is "finished" orally, yes, it represents sodomy. Such an act is obviously opposed to the natural order.

But when the act is "started" orally, is it then natural? This would seem to me to be splitting hairs, as it were. Either it is natural or it is not. If the act is unnatural, no rearrangement will change it. What does it matter in what order natural acts are completed? What business is it of yours if my wife ends up on top? Where is the compelling state interest to keep her below me in my own home?

175 posted on 03/19/2003 10:53:46 AM PST by Liberal Classic (Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentis telum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Liberal Classic
Darn, you beat me to it (see Msg#176).
182 posted on 03/19/2003 10:56:32 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson