[San Jacinto]

Incredible that the AP reporter poses as the penultimate expert on international law.

The assertion does not even make logical sense. Why would the defeat of another resolution cause a subsequent attack to violate international law?

The last resolution providing for "serious consequences" is sufficient. Let's Roll!

[longtermmemmory]

everyone, please

THERE IS NO INTERNATIONAL LAW!

There are conventions, there are treaties, Even a book on international law will tell you there is no such animal.

The AP story is just fanning the USA vs the World leftist themes.

There was a thread about a journalism chat area were the journalist discuss this stuff. It was poynter or something. Probably some good inside infor there.