To: Sloth
Incredible that the AP reporter poses as the penultimate expert on international law.
The assertion does not even make logical sense. Why would the defeat of another resolution cause a subsequent attack to violate international law?
The last resolution providing for "serious consequences" is sufficient. Let's Roll!
57 posted on
03/17/2003 6:47:20 AM PST by
San Jacinto
(Chirac is So damn Insane---- he must think the D-Day invasion was led by Iraqis.)
To: San Jacinto; All
everyone, please
THERE IS NO INTERNATIONAL LAW!
There are conventions, there are treaties, Even a book on international law will tell you there is no such animal.
The AP story is just fanning the USA vs the World leftist themes.
There was a thread about a journalism chat area were the journalist discuss this stuff. It was poynter or something. Probably some good inside infor there.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson