Under the current circumstances that would not appear to be a really mouth-watering offer.
| To find all articles tagged or indexed using Freeper Resource: Sleuthing The Iraq-Bin Laden Connection, click below: | ||||
| click here >>> | Freeper Resource: Sleuthing The Iraq-Bin Laden Connection | <<< click here | ||
| (To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) | ||||
Everyone knows that. ;-)
Right? Right?!
(crickets)
My guess is that bin Laden was happy to cooperate and Iraq threw him a few bucks in exchange for a bit of friendly consultation on target selection.
It's pretty suspicious that bin Laden went after the WTC, since the early 1993 attack was almost certainly Iraqi-influenced. So Iraq chose another go at the WTC, and bin Laden provided troops and motivation.
That hangs together awfully well, in my view.
D
USS Cole: 17 dead mourned as experts piece together attack
Special report: Israel and the Middle East Special report: Iraq
Julian Borger in Washington Thursday October 19, 2000 The Guardian
[Mr Cannistraro] argued that the sophistication of the bomb - an estimated 272kg of high explosive shaped and placed within a metal container to channel the blast and penetrate the armoured hull of the USS Cole - suggested the involvement of a state.
"The Iraqis have wanted to be able to carry out terrorism for some time now," Mr Cannistraro said. "Their military people have had liaison with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, and could well have supplied the training."
He said the theory was still speculative but was consistent with the series of recent contacts between Baghdad and the Bin Laden organisation.
Steve Emerson: Emerson is a journalist (late of U.S. News &World Report and CNN) noted for his anonymous U.S. and Israeli intelligence sources (Extra!, 10-11/92, 11-12/93). These sources led him to announce, in the wake of the World Trade Center explosion, that the “bomber or bombers may be from one of the former Yugoslav republics.” (CNN, 3/2/93) That embarrassing error did not teach him caution: When the Murrah federal building was bombed, he immediately began insisting that all signs pointed to Muslim extremists.
There’s more than a little bigotry in Emerson’s obsession with Muslim terrorists. To him, the fact that many people were killed in the Oklahoma City bombing was evidence that Arabs were responsible: “This was done with the intent to inflict as many casualties as possible. That is a Middle Eastern trait.” (CBS News, 4/19/95)
Vincent Cannistraro: A former CIA official, Cannistraro directed covert operations for the National Security Council under the Reagan administration. His work with Nicaraguan contra rebels who routinely targeted civilians give him first-hand experience with terrorism that few analysts can boast of.
In 1991, Cannistraro told the Newhouse News Service (San Francisco Examiner, 4/21/91) that environmentalists were plotting to destroy humanity through the invention of killer viruses. “There are small organized clandestine cells working on the development of technologies to diminish or even eliminate the race of man from the earth,” he said, advancing a conspiracy theory as wacky as anything suggested by the militia movement.
His “expert” opinion was similarly off-base on the Oklahoma City Bombing. “Right now it looks professional, and it’s got the marks of a Middle Eastern group,” Cannistraro told the Washington Times (4/20/95).
Daniel Pipes: Pipes is a Middle East specialist associated with right-leaning, pro-Israeli think tanks like the Foreign Policy Research Institute and the Washington Institute on Near East Policy. In 1987 he wrote an article for The New Republic with Laurie Mylroie title, “Back Iraq: It’s Time for a U.S. Tilt.” (4/27/87) “Iraq is now the de facto protector of the regional status quo,” Pipes and Mylroie wrote--a little more than three years before Saddam Hussein attempted to annex Kuwait.
Pipes showed himself to be just as much an Islamic expert in his post-Oklahoma analysis. “People need to understand that this is just the beginning,” he told USA Today (4/20/95). “The fundamentalists are on the upsurge, and they make it clear that they are targeting us. They are absolutely obsessed with us.” Who’s obsessed with whom?
Neal Livingstone: Livingstone is a self-proclaimed counter-terrorism expert who heads his own Institute on Terrorism and Subnational Conflict. He offers tips to clients on how to deal with terrorism (Washington Post, 8/20/86): “If you don’t want to look like an American, wear tinted glasses.” “Don’t sit in first class.” “If armed with a knife and desirous of dispatching a guard or sentry, slip up behind him and, if right-handed, cup your left hand over his mouth, jerk his head upward, and push forward the knife across the side of his neck below the angle of the jaw.”
After breakfasting with Oliver North, Livingstone wrote in The National Review (1/20/87) that “the ‘Iran arms scandal’ could turn out to have been one of the [Reagan] administration’s finest hours.”
Livingstone was one of the most ubiquitous Oklahoma City “experts.” The London Daily Mail (4/21/95) reported that he was “convinced that a Middle Eastern group was behind the killings, and believes more outrages could follow. ‘Since the end of the Cold War, the biggest threat to the U.S. has come from the Middle East. I’m afraid what happened in Oklahoma has proved that.’”
After the arrest of Timothy McVeigh, Livingstone shifted gears smoothly, instantly becoming an expert on right-wing domestic extremist groups: “We didn’t think they were that severe a threat until these events,” he told Meet the Press (4/23/95) “We don’t see these people as terrorists, but there are some troublemakers.”
More on terrorism.
Vincent Cannistraro, former Chief of Counterterrorism Operations for the CIA's Counterterrorism Center, has suggested a very sensible and quite clever explanation for what was going on at al-Shifa--why it turned out to be a pharmaceutical factory; why the US had compelling evidence linking it to VX; and why it can't be found now. When US officials were obliged to defend their decision to attack the al-Shifa plant, after the Aug 20 strike, they revealed an Iraqi link to al-Shifa, as reported, for example, in the NYT Aug 25. US officials also revealed the existence of other sites in Khartoum thought to be associated with Iraq and VX production. Clinton chose al-Shifa as a target, because it was the only VX-related site not near a populated area.
Although the CIA did not know al-Shifa made pharmaceuticals, the State Dept did, because al Shifa was authorized by the UN sanctions committee to ship medicines to Iraq. Cannistraro suggested that Empta, manufactured at another Khartoum site, was stored, even perhaps packaged, at al-Shifa, to be sent to Baghdad, under UNSCR 986, looking to all the world like a pharmaceutical product.
That would explain how Empta could be found in a soil sample outside the facility-a leak/spill?; but also why extensive tests in the facility subsequently, including of the septic tank, did not detect it. It would also explain why Iraqi CW personnel had contact with a pharmaceutical plant. Moreover, Iraqi intelligence would think of something like that. Indeed, Scott Ritter, in his Sept 3 Senate testimony [see "Iraq News," Sept 7], explained that Iraq was importing proscribed and dual use material under cover of UNSCR 986.
The Guardian under THEIR President Clinton.