Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maquiladora
There will be remarks tomorrow afternoon, but Blair's scheduled to talk to the House of Commons on Tuesday morning. Bush, as a courtesy, will let Blair give his "speech" first. The soonest that Bush could give his would be that night. Neither would be "the bombs are falling" speeches, it would probably be a call for Hussein to be overthrown or voluntarily leave. My money is that the 3-days notice to aid workers, human shields, and inspectors might be a part of tomorrow's remarks.
30 posted on 03/15/2003 3:54:02 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative; All
Thats what I was thinking. The meeting in the Azores doesn't make much sence. The 3 leaders already agree on what needs to be done, so there's no diplomatic wrangling there, and the meeting is only going to be 60 minutes long! Why couldn't they have a conference call?

I figure they will present a deadline, outside the UN, a deadline from the coalition of the willing, a joint deadline that will give Saddam 72 hours to give up. This will give the press and inspectors time to leave too.

37 posted on 03/15/2003 3:58:51 PM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative
My money is that the 3-days notice to aid workers, human shields, and inspectors might be a part of tomorrow's remarks.

I'm with you on that one. I don't think we even want the UN to meet at all on this anymore.

84 posted on 03/15/2003 5:10:57 PM PST by knak (kelly in alaska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson