To: cyncooper
No, the burden of proof is on you to prove what is true. A person could make up whatever they want about anyone (just read National Enquirer). I’m just saying that we need to be above all that! That way, when garbage such as this comes out about Bush, we can vigorously discredit it! End of story.
To: ATCNavyRetiree
This is not the National Enquirer. Here's my source and I must say, I find him very credible:
The news comes from former military aide Lt. Col. Robert Patterson, who carried the nuclear "football" for President Clinton from May 1996 to May 1998. It is in Patterson's new book: Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised America's National Security.
Too bad you don't realize evidently exactly what type of person was at the head of the previous administration. Character matters and you will not find someone who worked closely with President Bush saying he was a liar or dishonorable. It just will not happen.
25 posted on
03/15/2003 11:12:18 AM PST by
cyncooper
(God Be With President Bush, Prime Minister Blair, and Prime Minister Aznar)
To: Poohbah
A vet on this thread needs some help in understanding our ex-prez...
To: ATCNavyRetiree
Are you familiar with Regnery? This book wouldn't have passed muster with their legal eagles if it was a crock.
32 posted on
03/15/2003 11:19:30 AM PST by
mewzilla
To: ATCNavyRetiree
No, the burden of proof is on you to prove what is true.
No, that's not quite right. Once a claim is made, if you want to dispute it, you need to do so specifically, where you feel the burden of proof hasn't been met. At that point, the burden is again upon the claimant.
Retorts such as...
"Pure garbage, just because you hate the guy, you don't have to stoop this low!"
and...
"What is this garbage (picture, or is it a poster)?? C'mon, I am a conservative just like you, but you really make us look foolish and stupid when you publish this trash!"
are rather emotional, in tone, and somewhat underwhelming in their particulars.
To: ATCNavyRetiree
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Sorry for your blind alegiance to this traitor,but that's your problem.
We KNOW the truth about X42 and it's ugly ugly ugly and turned out to be very dangerous to our national security and truth be told, the security of the free world.
To: ATCNavyRetiree
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson