Replies

Actually, the umpire already ruled it out of bounds. But I'm happy to try to explain. Then I got to leave and do actual real-world activism -- we're in the midst of a flurry of support our troops rallies here in DC, OK?

Lessee:

(2) The networks would interrupt their programming to say if they weren't overwhelmingly liberal.

Nope, it's not breaking. It's news all right, but it's not something that, say, FOX would break into regular programming for.

(3) Something that honestly would (not should, would) be of interest to majority of self-described conservatives.

I think the subtext on this is that it *would* be of interest as breaking news. If they just mean of interest period, well, everything would be breaking news.

Look, the Old Professer is right, hall monitors *do* trip and fall. Y'all shouldn't take offense, I've had my stuff yanked too. LOL, I'm no goody two-shoes, trust me. I'm just saying -- and if it bugs you I'm sorry 'cause I don't mean no offense -- I'm just saying that as the admins say, especially nowadays in these times of war, let's have an exacting standard for breaking news.

Just an idea. Now, the umpire -- and I'm not she -- has ruled on this one, and I think we should continue action on the field.

Off to my activist threads I go, bidding you good day.