Skip to comments.
Chirac lobbies the Turks to deny US bases and overflight rights
Fred Barnes on Fox News
| Me
Posted on 03/14/2003 3:51:45 PM PST by Dog
Fred Barnes while on the panel tonight on Special Report just stated Chirac is urging the Turks not to allow us bases and overflight rights.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: europeanunion; france; germany; iraq; jacqueschirac; jacquesiraques; nato; russia; waronterror; weasels
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-239 last
To: CurlyBill
"....to actively participate in undermining a nation that shed it's blood for you."
We did not "shed our blood for France" in the the same way we are not about to " shed our blood for the people of Iraq"
The French people know this the same way in that the Iraqi people will know this
We will be cheered as "liberators" but they will know that we did it for our own reasons. GW will do what he needs to do for the security of the USA.
221
posted on
03/14/2003 9:19:49 PM PST
by
RS
To: Happy2BMe
Chirac: Saddam, please, sit here beside me.
Hussein: No, Jacques, you come sit beside me.
222
posted on
03/14/2003 9:21:38 PM PST
by
algol
(Maybe I should add a barf alert?)
To: Guillermo
Has it been made official that France is an Enemy of the United States?Maybe another D-Day is in the offing, or should be.
223
posted on
03/14/2003 9:25:07 PM PST
by
Mark17
Comment #224 Removed by Moderator
To: Mark17
To: Dog
It's CHINA!!!!!!!!!!!!
226
posted on
03/14/2003 10:27:28 PM PST
by
lawdog
To: xm177e2
If Turkey told US to pound salt, they're sure as heck not going to be pressured by sodden hampsters in FRANCE. It's looking to me like Turkey just wants to get through this with its borders and independence intact. Can't really blame 'em -- we'd probably do the same thing in their shoes.
Agree with other folks here who noted that France is now part of the Axis.
227
posted on
03/14/2003 10:32:51 PM PST
by
ellery
To: ellery
American shoppers and tourists are going to take care of France and Germany.
228
posted on
03/14/2003 10:51:09 PM PST
by
bybybill
(first the public employees, next the fish and, finally, the children)
To: xm177e2
"Christian Democrats"
are these the Christians for abortion of the Democrats for Prayer in schools ?
229
posted on
03/14/2003 10:53:48 PM PST
by
RS
To: Happy2BMe
"Hey, Jack! Say what? No shit! No! You can never learn how to be a cowboy! You either have it or you don't!"
230
posted on
03/14/2003 10:57:07 PM PST
by
whadizit
(A)
To: bybybill
I hope so.
231
posted on
03/14/2003 11:07:04 PM PST
by
ellery
To: Dog
hehe Chirac is screwed. He's backed France into a corner where they will simply have to respond to our invasion of Iraq with something like an embargo. Lovely.
To: RS
The "Christian Democratic Union" is the CDU, the conservative party in Germany. I wasn't referring to American Democrats.
233
posted on
03/14/2003 11:09:34 PM PST
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: a_Turk
Many folks around here haven't the knowledge necessary to make any other decision beyond an immediate reaction based on a momentary impression.
234
posted on
03/14/2003 11:16:17 PM PST
by
Mortimer Snavely
(Is anyone else tired of reading these tag lines?)
To: RS
We did not "shed our blood for France" in the the same way we are not about to " shed our blood for the people of Iraq" I disagree. The goal was to get the Germans out of France to stop Nazi expansion throughout Europe. Liberation, regardelss of the motive, was the goal. Yes, we did it for ourselves only as a matter of preemption ... but the fact is that they were liberated because we wanted the French, not the Nazis, in control of France. Liberation was the goal, the defeat of the German Army was the means. Regardless, I would hope that you and I would certainly agree that the actions of the French in this matter has been outrageous.
To: CurlyBill
"The goal was to get the Germans out of France to stop Nazi expansion throughout Europe. Liberation, regardelss of the motive, was the goal. "
The first goal you mention is correct, your second "goal" was simply a byproduct or stepping stone on the way.
If there had been a militarily advantageous method of attacking Germany directly, bypassing the "liberation" of France, we would have certainly gone that route.
Further, I am sure that given the choice, the French people would have prefered we had gone another way. Why have two foreign armies destroying your towns and villages if there is a second solution ?
236
posted on
03/15/2003 9:08:07 AM PST
by
RS
To: Straight Vermonter
BTW, it is not a 2001 anymore. Update your info.
To: cunning_fish
You are on a ten year old thread, dumbass.
238
posted on
08/03/2013 10:44:21 AM PDT
by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Straight Vermonter
>>>dumbass.<<<
Take it easy. I ‘ve no idea how I got here:-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-239 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson