However, a new reason has come to the fore, which undermines Bush: his unwillingness to act after all these months suggests that the administration does not fully believe that an invasion is the right thing to do.
As the author points out the 'endgame' of this action in Iraq will be an occupation by the U.S. forces for an indeterminate period of time. Perhaps the delay is more of a logistical one of positioning the troops and assuring the least amount of problems in implementing said occupation
I can't argue with the idea that the President has waited far too long in begining the liberation of Iraq.