[shadowman99]

Actually, this is perfect. There's not a chance in hell it will work, but it provides some oportunities. This will be a chance to contrast Bush's actions against Clinton's during his missile strikes on Iraq.

If Conyer's bill says Bush should be impeached because he's acting without UN sanction, we can point at all of the times Clinton did the same. It will provide a public forum for examining Clinton's record on defending our country, and that's some legacy busting stuff there.

These articles of impeachment may also provoke Bush and Co. into tearing into the Clinton administration. This would damage Hillary beyond repair.

Also keep in mind that Clinton's poll number skyrocketed during his impeachment. Like it or not, it's undeniable that people rallied behind him.

[photogirl]

bump

[mabelkitty]

Yes, the UN problem.

As such, under Mr. Conyers way of thinking, shouldn't he be bringing an indictment on war crimes against Mr. Clinton for Kosovo?

Afterall, Mr. Conyers wouldn't want to look partisan now would he?

[Canadian Outrage]

Clinton INDISCRIMINATELY bombed countries 4 different times, EACH time bypassing the UN!! SO DEMOCRAPS??????? Oh and let's not forget, ONCE to avert his sexual & legal problems from going before a hearing. WHAT NONSENSE!!

[sweetliberty]

"we can point at all of the times Clinton did the same"

The problem with that is that contradiction does not compute with these people. Their hypocrisy is shameless and boundless.

[Consort]

Also keep in mind that Clinton's poll number skyrocketed during his impeachment. Like it or not, it's undeniable that people rallied behind him.

They fell for the demonization of Ken Starr, Linda Tripp, et al. Most never knew that an impeachment is a political rather than a legal procedure. One can be impeached even though no crime was committed; bad behavior can be grounds for impeachment. The uninformed public equated impeachment with removal and the liberal media never clarified the difference.