Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gianni
Your assertion:

1. Unmarked cars attempted to make a stop by 'boxing in'
2. In the attempt, the suspect attempted to flee.

Law enforcement report:

"Federal officials say the car pulled away from the house at high speed with the headlights off. When agents tried to box the car in, they say, the girl kept coming toward them and crashed into their vehicle, then threw the car into reverse and rammed the DEA vehicle behind her."

So actually:

1. The suspect attempted to flee.
2. Unmarked police vehicles blocked the attempt by 'boxing in'

Your assertion had things backwards.

148 posted on 03/16/2003 10:32:01 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe
Sorry bud, I wasn't trying to give them chronolocical ordering, only indexing so that I could refer back to the ones that would cause me to crap my drawers and ram "police" cars and run over "cops."

That is, "police" cars that look like ordinary cars, and "cops" who are dressed in plainclothes pointing guns at me and shouting.

Sorry for the confusion about ordering. By the way, what you stated was not an undisputed fact in this case. Nobody, the cops or the family, has claimed that the girl was 'trying to flee' as you have chosen to phrase it. Unless that's Roscoespeak for "drive a car."

159 posted on 03/16/2003 7:17:25 PM PST by Gianni (tag - You're it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson