Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Republicans Look to Scrap Primaries (BAD IDEA ALERT)
Associated Press ^ | March 12, 2003

Posted on 03/12/2003 10:05:26 PM PST by Timesink

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:35:45 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004primaries; budgetcrunch; campaign2004
BAD IDEA. This just opens us up to all sorts of false accusations. And it does reek of undemocratic principles. I can just imagine the ruckus over this resulting in some Bush-hating RINO announcing he's running just to muck up the works.

For God's sake, spend the money and leave the process alone.

1 posted on 03/12/2003 10:05:26 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I agree, this isn't just anti-Democratic, it's anti-democratic.
2 posted on 03/12/2003 10:19:26 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I agree, but I can give a solid arguement for both sides here.

Primaries were intended for PARTY MEMBERS to choose the nominee for president. That's the traditionalist arguement.(and I like open primaries myself).

Now, the best way to combat 'caucuses'? It's to become a PRECINCT DELEGATE.

3 posted on 03/12/2003 10:40:35 PM PST by Dan from Michigan (Every man dies. Not every man really lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
I don't know what's so undemocratic about doing away with primaries. Republicans have been screwed out of a viable candidate a few times specifically because of primaries. The only people that participate in primaries are hardliners who tend to not represent the overall majority of the party. Presidential candidates have to appeal to these people and then do an turnaround as soon as they are nominated in order to rally the remainder of the voters within its own party, let alone appeal to those voters who are not Republican. This puts Republicans at a disadvantage because there are more registered Democrats than there are Republicans, so Republicans are already starting from behind.
I don't think its undemocratic to have a process in which the party elites decide among themselves which candidate would have the broadest appeal in a national election. This whole fascination with primaries is merely a gimmick to get media time and make states like Iowa and New Hampshire feel important. Nothing against those two states, but the Party should be focused on the larger picture than having our candidates tear each other apart in front of the cameras to win some meaningless caucus like Iowa.
4 posted on 03/12/2003 10:50:44 PM PST by nunoste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
There is talk of doing this in Texas too. If the people pushing this are successful, candidate positions may come to reflect those of the single-issue zealots who attend caucuses in greater proportions than their numbers among voters. Those positions may not resonate with voters -- if so, the GOP will lose. Better to see what flies with the public in the primaries.
5 posted on 03/12/2003 11:22:46 PM PST by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson