Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snowmobile Ban Bill; Piece of Florida Preserved
Environmental News Service ^ | March 6, 2003

Posted on 03/12/2003 8:41:58 AM PST by cogitator

Bipartisan Bill Would Ban Snowmobiles in National Parks

WASHINGTON, DC, March 6, 2003 (ENS) - A bipartisan bill to phase out snowmobile use in Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks was introduced in Congress Thursday. The legislation, its sponsors say, would save the parks from the threats posed by the Bush administration's decision to permit increased snowmobile use in both parks.

The Yellowstone Protection Act was introduced in the Senate by Senators Lincoln Chafee, a Rhode Island Republican, and Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat. It was unveiled in the House by Representatives Rush Holt, a New Jersey Democrat, and Connecticut Republican Christopher Shays.

"This administration continues to ignore its own scientific evidence and the clear voice of the American people and we will not stand for it," Holt said. "Yellowstone is the people's park, and Congress created the National Park Service over 80 years ago to protect it.

"Today we in Congress are taking action to ensure that the Park Service does not compromise its founding mission. We must protect Yellowstone for future generations of Americans to enjoy."

If signed into law, the measure would overrule the National Park Service's recent decision and ban snowmobiles from Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks.

"Science, law and pubic opinion all strongly support phasing out snowmobiles," Shays said.

The snowmobile controversy in the national parks began in 1998 when the park service began studying the effects of snowmobile use on park wildlife, air quality, human health and visitor experience. The study found snowmobile use was damaging all of them, as did a review by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

During a public comment period on the snowmobile rule, some 80 percent of the 350,000 comments received by the Park Service supported the phaseout of snowmobiles, but the Bush administration rejected the rule in favor of snowmobiles.

The outright ban is not needed, the Bush administration said, because daily limits on use of snowmobiles and new technologies can adequately protect the parks.

The Yellowstone Protection Act currently has 134 bipartisan co-sponsors.

"There is a reason that Park Rangers wear gas masks at the west entrance of Yellowstone. It's because they are subjected to a chemical assault," Holt said. "I ask you, is this any way to treat the rangers who work so hard to make sure that all Americans can enjoy their national parks? Is this any way to treat the park itself?"

Conservancy Buys Jewel of Apalachicola River

ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, Florida, March 6, 2003 (ENS) - The Nature Conservancy has purchased nearly 300 acres of native forestland bordered on two sides by Florida's Apalachicola River. This short, broad peninsula of bottomland hardwood forest in northern Liberty County juts into the river and is adjacent to Torreya State Park.

The Apalachicola River has the largest forested floodplain in Florida. The new parcel is home to as many as 60 tree species, such as tupelo, sycamore and winged elm. In addition, the rare one-toed amphium (Amphium pholeter) inhabits the rich floodplain soils.

The property is so important that the Florida Division of Recreation and Parks has been, "trying to acquire this land for half a century," according to Albert Gregory, bureau chief of park planning.

The property was purchased for $819,000 from Neal Land and Timber Company through their intermediary PDO Inc. In the 1930s, the Neal family donated the bulk of the land that became Torreya State Park. The park protects portions of steep ravines, upland pine and hardwood forests and river floodplains. The region is biologically unique to Florida and is inhabited by many species more commonly found in the Appalachian Mountains.

The Conservancy has worked with Neal Land and Timber Company and the Division of Recreation and Parks for several years to preserve this land.

"We are thrilled to put this incredible piece of land into permanent protection," added Vicki Tschinkel, state director of the Florida Chapter of The Nature Conservancy.

The Conservancy has focused on the Apalachicola River as a priority protection area because of the natural resources along the river and in its downstream estuary, Apalachicola Bay.

The Conservancy recently designated the Apalachicola River and adjoining portions of the Florida Panhandle as one of the top six hot spots of biological diversity in the United States.

Numerous rare and imperiled plant and animal species, such as the federally threatened Gulf sturgeon, occur both within the river and in the forested habitats of its floodplains, ravines and uplands.

The Conservancy plans to convey the property to the state for inclusion in Torreya State Park in the near future. Gregory said, "We are very pleased that this important tract will now be added to the holdings of the Division of Recreation and Parks, as it will help us to better manage the entire ecosystem encompassed by this unique Florida park."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: enviralists; florida; grandteton; snowmobile; yellowstone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
I would love to take a snowmobile trip through Yellowstone, but I actually favor the ban. What we need are non- polluting and quiet snowmobiles.
1 posted on 03/12/2003 8:41:58 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cogitator
I read the head line and thought that Snowmobiles were to be banned in Florida. First thought was that Michigan should retaliate by banning growing Orange trees.

Guess I need more sleep.
2 posted on 03/12/2003 8:49:48 AM PST by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Why not just put a couple of "Snowmobile Tags" on hunting licenses and let varmit hunters with .50 cals thin the herd?
It would be more sporting and could even become a TV series.

So9

3 posted on 03/12/2003 8:51:49 AM PST by Servant of the Nine (Republicans for Sharpton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists; farmfriend
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
4 posted on 03/12/2003 8:52:20 AM PST by Free the USA (Stooge for the Rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garyb
LOL! Same here--first thought was 'just another wasted day in Congress.'

After reading the article, then I decided...'just another wasted day in Congress.'

5 posted on 03/12/2003 8:52:39 AM PST by NautiNurse (Usama bin Laden has produced more tapes than Steely Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
More restrictions on freedom.

BS! Just ban ALL vehicles from these places. ALL. Make the envirowhackos WALK to see the pretty animals. Make joe six-pack(me) get off his azz and hike in. Pull all the roads up and return it to nature.

While we're at it lets outlaw breathing since every single person exhales carbon dioxide.

We do NOT need this. If I wanna scream by bambi doing 100 mph then thats MY bizness.

We need more laws like we need another 9-11.
6 posted on 03/12/2003 8:54:21 AM PST by Stopislamnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow
We do NOT need this. If I wanna scream by bambi doing 100 mph then thats MY bizness.

Well, you also scream by other users who don't care to smell a stinkin' two-cycle engine and hear all that noise. Having said that, I think a ban is stupid - Yellowstone is big enough to have snowmobiles in part of it and non-engine recreational use in other parts. But IMO the snowmobiler community has brought a lot of this on itself by their lack of consideration for other users of the outdoors in winter, and the snowmobile industry has been slow to shift over to four-cycle engines with adequate mufflers.

7 posted on 03/12/2003 9:00:10 AM PST by dirtboy (The Pentagon thinks they can create TIA when they can't even keep track of their own contractors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: cogitator
Yellowstone is the people's park

Who does he think is on the snowmobiles? Moose?

9 posted on 03/12/2003 9:02:49 AM PST by Stay the course
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walkingman
I worked in Yellowstone... we referred to people like you as Tourons


Typical Govt Employee. Calling people names and screaming "its for the children/environment" while delivering substandard work, opposing freedom and passing the buck so someone else needs hired by the govt to clean up the mess they made by not doing thier job properly in the first place.

Glad you said "worked" and not work, there's still hope.

10 posted on 03/12/2003 9:16:13 AM PST by Stopislamnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: cogitator
I was in Yellowstone last winter, and did not see one gas mask. I think many of these people who oppose snowmobiling in yellowstone, should have to take one of the trips, or at least set foot there in the dead of winter. I think by the end of a trip they might start questioning the methods used by those who say great and un-manageable damage is occurring.

I think it is fair to say we don't have unbiased observers here formulating and reccomending these policies as well. The National Forest Service has become an isolationist group steeped in the fables of ecosystems. They view National Parks in the same manner as the Bio-dome. They do not believe man is part of nature. They are an elitist group who actually covets the lands for themselves, and wish to share it with no one. They take many actions that indicate such.

If you want to see National Parks Destroyed, then reduce the number of people who get to productively use them to near zero numbers. In another 100 years, you will have a generation who has never visited them, known the beauty, adventure, the natural resources, and spiritualism within. It won't be hard for them to decide we could just cut them down, sell them off, or let them burn.

Put succintly, Use 'Em or Lose 'Em.

---- lates

12 posted on 03/12/2003 9:47:13 AM PST by jrawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; Carry_Okie; Grampa Dave; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; hedgetrimmer; ...
ping
13 posted on 03/12/2003 9:55:15 AM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
14 posted on 03/12/2003 10:09:41 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Didnt this idiot say that the park was formed for ALL THE PEOPLE I guess people that ride snowmobiles are not REAL PEOPLE. Typical demo bulls--t.
15 posted on 03/12/2003 10:13:27 AM PST by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
How much you wanna bet that the FWS and Park Service et al will still be able to drive whatever vehicles they want at any time they want, regardless of what's banned.

They are the princes and the lords after all, and don't have to live by the rules.

16 posted on 03/12/2003 10:15:39 AM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cogitator; farmfriend
I would like to see Senators Lincoln Chafee, a Rhode Island Republican, and Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, Representatives Rush Holt, a New Jersey Democrat, and Connecticut Republican Christopher Shays try and outrun a wolf on foot. Myself, I'll use a snowmobile then when I'm out side the park, a 30-06 to bring him around to being polite and respectful of human beings..
17 posted on 03/12/2003 10:38:20 AM PST by B4Ranch (Politicians, like diapers should be changed often. Stop re-electing these 'good' people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
The only way you could enforce this ban is for park rangers to have snowmobiles to patrol the park. Does that make sense?
18 posted on 03/12/2003 11:02:01 AM PST by Russell Scott ((Saddam, beware the Ides of March))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
The only way you could enforce this ban is for park rangers to have snowmobiles to patrol the park. Does that make sense?

It's not really that hard, and a few forays by individuals aren't really a problem. The snowmobile tours are controlled by contractors, and they enter the park at the gates (just like cars). So they'd really just have to watch the entrances.

19 posted on 03/12/2003 11:33:06 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
I suppose that only government employees and politicians doing "fact-finding" will be the only ones to be allowed to use snowmobiles in the PEOPLE'S PARK.

Sheesh, I can't imagine a better way to travel in a snow covered park.

20 posted on 03/12/2003 11:37:36 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson