[RnMomof7]

Ah. So a police officer who shoots a bank robber during the commission of his crime has committed murder -- has killed an innocent person, since the robber "hadn't been convicted of anything in a court of law." Interesting.

This article has TOO much common sense in it Madfly..will this man run for office?

[Black Agnes]

He's a looneytarian. I dunno. Here's his opinion page.

Vin's Opinion Page at Las Vegas Review Journal

[madfly]

This is the first article I've read of his, thanks to Black Agnes. I just think he's a kick. I posted the other one she sent, THE ATTACK OF THE KILLER EUPHAMISMS, lol, but I spelled it EUPHASIMS and boy is it getting the hits!

HERE

[JaimeD2]

But following that same logic, the officer had clearly not at that point committed murder, since he had not been convicted in a court of law of shooting anybody. So what we have is a system in which nobody can ever be called guilty of anything - in which nothing ever happens. That is, unless they say something impolite.