To: js1138
Seriously, though. I don't mean to be overbearing. I'm not moderating this discussion, and I don't intend to try. I was kidding on my earlier post and didn't intend people to take me seriously. I just wanted to have an argument that didn't involve DNA, RNA, YEC, ID, or other BS.
41 posted on
03/11/2003 1:33:40 PM PST by
gomaaa
To: gomaaa
I was kidding on my earlier post and didn't intend people to take me seriously. That should be seriesly. And the article points out a hugh discovery.
42 posted on
03/11/2003 1:40:50 PM PST by
AndrewC
To: gomaaa
Legitimate science articles don't generate enough heat to last more than 50 posts. A few complaints here and there about how the writer oversimplified things and you're done.
That's because reasonable people who can read will quickly come to a consensus about what the article says and whether it's important.
If you want the thread to last you have to yank a few nutball chains.
43 posted on
03/11/2003 1:44:11 PM PST by
js1138
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson