Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan angling to net biggest fish: bin Laden
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | March 12 2003 | Marian Wilkinson, Herald Correspondent in Washington

Posted on 03/11/2003 7:23:47 AM PST by dead

Elusive ... Osama bin Laden.

Pakistan has hinted that it is closing in on Osama bin Laden, with its ambassador to the United States saying "some bigger fish" may be captured soon.

Speaking at an anti-terrorism forum in Washington on the recent arrest of al-Qaeda's right-hand man, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, Ashraf Jehangir Qazi said: "There is reason to believe that hopefully in the future we might even have some bigger fish captured and we will get on top of this problem of terrorism as such."

Mr Qazi's comments were unusually frank and follow statements by Pakistani intelligence officials that an al-Qaeda suspect arrested last week in Peshawar had been in contact with bin Laden. The suspect, known only as Masood, was reported to be either Afghan or Egyptian.

The Pakistani officials also said on Monday that Mohammed had told interrogators he met bin Laden in December, but refused to say where. They said Mohammed was suffering from a high fever during three days of interrogation by a joint US-Pakistani team before being transferred to US custody at an undisclosed location.

During the first two days Mohammed was unco-operative but on the third day he "started divulging information on his contacts inside and outside Pakistan", including a meeting with bin Laden in December, one of the officials said.

One official said that on the basis of the interrogation and other evidence, investigators believed bin Laden was alive.

Since Mohammed's arrest a series of raids have netted 10 more suspects. Mohammed is believed by US intelligence to be the chief planner of the September 11 attacks and al-Qaeda's military commander. He also had close links to al-Qaeda's South-East Asian cells.

Pakistan has been anxious to claim credit for the arrests after US reports portrayed Mohammed's capture as a joint US-Pakistani operation.

Mr Qazi told the forum at George Washington University that Pakistan had taken "the major role in tracking down and arresting and detaining and handing over large numbers of suspects". He said a total of 500 arrests had been made.

Twice he said Pakistan hoped to catch "bigger fish", adding: "If there are such bigger fish in the pond within the area in which we operate they will certainly be captured because Pakistan is not a safe place, not a safe haven for any al-Qaeda or any terrorists."

Documents and computers seized at the time of Mohammed's arrest also produced leads, as did two other suspects who were taken into custody at the time.

US Special Forces have reportedly joined the hunt for bin Laden on the Pakistani-Afghan border and are working closely with the Pakistan military. But given bin Laden's success at eluding capture, US officials have been anxious to play down reports that he is close to being caught.

The US President, George Bush, has been intensely frustrated by the failure to capture bin Laden and no longer refers to him. White House officials were quick to deny reports last week that bin Laden's sons had been captured.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: obltrail

1 posted on 03/11/2003 7:23:47 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead
That last terrorist cost $27 million.
2 posted on 03/11/2003 7:25:48 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Concering OBL the only that will convince me is a DNA match on live or dead tissue.
3 posted on 03/11/2003 7:26:33 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Well, the budget for Tom Green's last movie "Stealing Harvard" was $30 million
4 posted on 03/11/2003 7:27:17 AM PST by Hazzardgate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
That last terrorist cost $27 million.

And worth every penny!

5 posted on 03/11/2003 7:27:44 AM PST by John123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead
If Pakistan lands Bin Laden, the US will owe them big time.
6 posted on 03/11/2003 7:29:59 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
I heard a caller to talk radio this week say we should spend a million buck$ on flyers dropped over Iraq, etc., offering a Million Buck$ or so, to whomever brings in Hussein, dead or alive. Might work for bin Laden, too. Offer several million$ for whomever brings in bin Laden. I know there are already bounties on their heads.
7 posted on 03/11/2003 7:30:32 AM PST by buffyt (The anti-war celebrities are just like the French, they actually think their opinions matter! ~MikeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
All this bragging and nattering p*sses me off and sounds like empty chest-beating. Just do it! And don't talk about it until you've done it!
8 posted on 03/11/2003 7:31:36 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom; snopercod; joanie-f; harpseal; Squantos; brityank; TPartyType
Here is the choice:

Pakistan stops protecting bin Laden in exchange for no invasion of Iraq.

What would be your decision?

There are only hours to decide.

9 posted on 03/11/2003 8:13:25 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Take Iraq now and fish for Bin Lden later.
10 posted on 03/11/2003 8:26:12 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
How much support would there be for war against Iraq, if bin Laden was suddenly captured?
11 posted on 03/11/2003 9:09:25 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hazzardgate
Well, the budget for Tom Green's last movie "Stealing Harvard" was $30 million

$30 milion for OBL would be real cheap, especially if he is taken alive.

12 posted on 03/11/2003 9:28:17 AM PST by Norman Arbuthnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Little support after this long drawn out preperation. However our intent is to have a military presence in the ME so we kill several birds with one stone.
13 posted on 03/11/2003 9:28:33 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
I would think Pakistan would want Saddam out of the way. They've made their proverbial bed (and we in it, bro!), so, so far as Islamic fundamentalists are concerned, the Pakistani government has sided with the great satan. They'd be better off doing as cynicom says, Saddam now, Osama later.

Then again, maybe we can take care of both at once!! Wouldn't that be somethin'!

14 posted on 03/12/2003 2:27:40 AM PST by TPartyType
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson