Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne
In the case of the woman you mentioned with 8 kids, all being neglected, I would ask, why does society assume SHE and she alone is solely responsible for their care and support? I would file child negligence charges at the very least against her AND fathers of these kids.

In this case it's like this - you and I are bank robbers. We run into the bank masked, blow away a few bystanders and bank folks, and run out the door. I get away, you get captured.

Who gets villified in the press?

You do. You're visible, and you're caught. The fact that I'm equally guilty means nothing.

Similarly, this woman is visible. So is her filthy, neglected child with an IQ of 25.

Regardless of the obvious fact that there's a male involved in this travesty, this woman is caught and visible. And she does it over and over and over and over...

There has to be a penalty. I'm all for busting her male accomplices as well. But the fact that they "got away" doesn't escuse her. She's still guilty of aggression against society by having her bastards. Strip them from her and put her in jail where she can't reproduce any more, I say. If we don't, she'll do it again as sure as God made males who act irresponsibly.

Put her male accomplices in jail too, you say? Heck yes, I'm all for it.

41 posted on 03/14/2003 11:44:10 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: jimt
escuse = excuse
42 posted on 03/14/2003 11:45:41 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson