Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: CoolGuyVic
Were these people hired under Clinton in the 90's?
2 posted on
03/10/2003 7:27:51 PM PST by
what's up
To: CoolGuyVic
Ahh. The strategery becomes clear. We aren't going to attack Iraq. We're just gonna bluster until the State Dept. rids itself of all the Clintonites, who are self-destructing under the pressure
3 posted on
03/10/2003 7:29:34 PM PST by
XEHRpa
To: CoolGuyVic
Two down, only eleven hundred to go.
First Al Queada, the Iraqies, then the UN, and then the State Department. Who would of thought Bush would of not only fought, but beat America's enemies.
4 posted on
03/10/2003 7:29:36 PM PST by
Leisler
To: CoolGuyVic
Time to get that Saudi lobbyist gig. Nice last words. The Saudis understand what "instability" means.
5 posted on
03/10/2003 7:29:48 PM PST by
Shermy
To: CoolGuyVic
Liberal mole?
7 posted on
03/10/2003 7:30:09 PM PST by
Consort
To: CoolGuyVic
Kiesling was one of the people who attacked our government for not intervening in Bosnia. You see, Bosnia was a human rights disaster with a brutal dictator committing horrible crimes. It was nothing like Iraq [/sarcasm]
To: CoolGuyVic
One can only hope that Senators would resign in protest.
10 posted on
03/10/2003 7:31:17 PM PST by
Cboldt
To: CoolGuyVic
At this pace, in about 100 years, all of the Communists will ahve finally resigned from the U.S. State Department. If there is anything we can do to expedite the process, let us know.
11 posted on
03/10/2003 7:31:25 PM PST by
Beck_isright
(going to the war without the french is like duck hunting without your accordian)
To: CoolGuyVic
The Bush Doctrine -- Clean House Time.
Afghanistan, Iraq, the United Nations, the U.S. State Department, the U.S. Senate, etc..
To: CoolGuyVic
Why do we need a diplomat at Georgetown University?
13 posted on
03/10/2003 7:34:06 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: CoolGuyVic
Good. Another sissy-boy, appeasement loving, left wing jackass departs the State Dept. If we could only clean house and get rid of all the dead wood there (meaning about 95% of all the idiots employed there) we'd be off to a good start.
17 posted on
03/10/2003 7:35:40 PM PST by
UncleSamUSA
(the land of the free and the home of the brave)
To: CoolGuyVic
Good. I hope the door hits him square in his butt on the way out.
20 posted on
03/10/2003 7:37:22 PM PST by
LibKill
(The UN is of less use than dog doo in the gutter.)
To: CoolGuyVic
Although he was resigning from the State Department, Brown was quick to point out that he would be retaining his membership in the Communist Party.
To: CoolGuyVic
Here's the bio:
John Brown is a Research Associate in the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy. Professor Brown joined the Foreign Service in 1981 and has served in London, Prague, Krakow, Kiev, Belgrade and, most recently, Moscow, where he was Cultural Affairs Officer (1998-2001) at the American Embassy. His current research includes: American culture in Russiam 1990-2000; propaganda and American public diplomacy.
To: CoolGuyVic
Honestly, I'm surprised only two career dip-lo-weenies have resigned. This is a good sign that our policy is well-founded.
To: CoolGuyVic
GREAT! Clean out the government from the Hillary Clinton holdovers!
24 posted on
03/10/2003 7:43:49 PM PST by
kcvl
To: CoolGuyVic
I have an interesting theory about human nature on these resignations. For these people to agree with Bush's new policy they have to acknowledge that Clinton's polices and theirs by association were wrong.
If they were wrong then they are partially responsible for 9-11. To admit that they are partially at fault for 9-11 is too much for them to accept so its better to feel that Bush is wrong.
25 posted on
03/10/2003 7:43:54 PM PST by
VRWC_minion
( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: CoolGuyVic
Good!
Hopefully they will all quit.
28 posted on
03/10/2003 7:47:21 PM PST by
sport
To: CoolGuyVic
"``Our fervent pursuit of war with Iraq is driving us to squander the international legitimacy that has been America's most potent weapon of both offense and defense since the days of Woodrow Wilson," Keep Saddam fully armed? What a jerk. Good riddance.
31 posted on
03/10/2003 7:52:06 PM PST by
NetValue
(Militant Islamics are hate-filled losers. The french, they are a funny "race"....you know the rest.)
To: CoolGuyVic
Who are these people??????
33 posted on
03/10/2003 8:41:28 PM PST by
Bombard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson