Skip to comments.
Partial Birth Abortion-live thread at senate
www.cspan.org ^
| 3/10/03
| VRWC_minion
Posted on 03/10/2003 4:16:02 PM PST by VRWC_minion
I was surprised to see debate occuring on senate floor regarding partial birth abortion.
TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; pbaban2003
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
To: VRWC_minion
Go to Cspan2, it is listed as middle east peace process, not abortion.
2
posted on
03/10/2003 4:16:59 PM PST
by
VRWC_minion
( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
It's going on now?
3
posted on
03/10/2003 4:17:03 PM PST
by
Green
To: Green
It is on now, and includes a shameless display by some of our favorite Democrat Senators.
4
posted on
03/10/2003 4:18:19 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: VRWC_minion
U.S. Senate to address Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act Beginning the week of March 10, the U.S. Senate will begin debate on the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.
This action is in response to President Bush's appeal to ban an abhorrent procedure that offends human dignity. The legislation (S. 3), sponsored by Sen. Rick Santorum, would ban an abortion method in which a living baby is mostly delivered alive before being killed. The bill has been a major prolife priority since 1995.
It was twice vetoed by President Clinton.
A January Gallup poll found that 70 percent of the public favors the ban. Nevertheless, the bill still faces fierce resistance from lawmakers closely allied with the abortion lobby.
It is not yet known whether pro-abortion senators will attempt to impede the bill with a filibuster.
Close votes are expected on crippling amendments, including an alternative measure that prolife groups refer to as "the phony ban."
ACTION REQUESTED
Because the vote is so near, phone calls and faxed letters are the best way to communicate with senators' offices.
Ask our senators to support the Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 2003. E-mail is also useful, but in some cases it may not be counted in time to impact the vote. Where possible, use all three of these modes of communication.
Ask them to support only the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act sponsored by Sen. Rick Santorum, and to oppose any amendments that gut the bill of any practical effectiveness
5
posted on
03/10/2003 4:20:23 PM PST
by
apackof2
(....the object is make the other son of a bitch die for his country)
To: Green
Apparently live. Boxer is amazed there is no womens health exception. Asking for support for amendments on womens health.
Roe v wade is a "modest" descision.
6
posted on
03/10/2003 4:21:08 PM PST
by
VRWC_minion
( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
bttt
7
posted on
03/10/2003 4:21:41 PM PST
by
firewalk
To: VRWC_minion
THe most important thing of all this is about real people-Boxer.
8
posted on
03/10/2003 4:22:38 PM PST
by
VRWC_minion
( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
Are they going to vote on this tonight?
9
posted on
03/10/2003 4:24:10 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: VRWC_minion
WTF is this woman yakking about? Is killing babies something she is proud of?
It's OK to kill babies in the womb, but not to execute convicted murders....go figure.
I'll never figure these people out...why bother any more?
10
posted on
03/10/2003 4:24:47 PM PST
by
GRRRRR
(Scuse me Mr. DaisyCutter, did you drop something??)
To: VRWC_minion
Boxer is challenging the R's to make this about ALL abortion.
11
posted on
03/10/2003 4:25:07 PM PST
by
VRWC_minion
( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Cboldt
Er, aren't those RATs supposed to be filibustering Estrada? I think it's time for another cloture vote.
12
posted on
03/10/2003 4:25:12 PM PST
by
steveegg
(12 years of inspections + 0 compliance = no peace ... 200,000 troops + 1 W = peace + liberation)
To: VRWC_minion
Boxer is amazed there is no womens health exception.Can you tell me what health risk there is to a woman who can apparently deliver a viable baby?
13
posted on
03/10/2003 4:25:17 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: Howlin
No idea. I just stumbled on this.
14
posted on
03/10/2003 4:25:52 PM PST
by
VRWC_minion
( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
Guess I'll log on to cspan and see if I can stomach some of this while I still sit here at work trying to get a few more things done before I leave for the day.
15
posted on
03/10/2003 4:27:57 PM PST
by
Green
To: VRWC_minion; All
16
posted on
03/10/2003 4:28:36 PM PST
by
Jean S
To: VRWC_minion
bttt
17
posted on
03/10/2003 4:28:39 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: Green
Who would want to have a child with MOST of these women anyway?
18
posted on
03/10/2003 4:29:30 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: VRWC_minion
If the procedure takes 3 days (I didn't know that) how can it be safe ? Followed by several DR's quotes about how its not necessary.
19
posted on
03/10/2003 4:29:41 PM PST
by
VRWC_minion
( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: kcvl
They all look good after 2 am.
20
posted on
03/10/2003 4:30:46 PM PST
by
VRWC_minion
( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson