Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S., France compete for U.N. Iraq votes
UPI | 3/10/2003 5:23 PM | Eli J. Lake State Department Correspondent

Posted on 03/10/2003 3:15:46 PM PST by demlosers

WASHINGTON, March 10 (UPI) -- Both proponents and opponents of war against Iraq are ratcheting up their drive for votes on the U.N. Security Council as the U.S. prepares to introduce a final Iraq resolution.

After meeting with Guinea's Foreign Minister Francois Fall in Washington, Secretary of State Colin Powell tried to calm rising tension between France and the United States over the competition for votes expected this week in the U.N. Security Council.

"I'm in no competition with (French Foreign Minister) Dominique de Villepin," Powell told reporters. "He does what he has to do, and I do what I have to do. We are both working for causes we believe in, we are both trying to consult with all the members of the council."

De Villepin on Sunday left for a tour of Angola, Cameroon and Guinea in an effort to persuade the three African votes on the Security Council to support the French, German and Russian position of extending inspections in Iraq and opposing an automatic declaration of war by the United Nations. The United Kingdom's minister for African affairs, Baroness Amos, was expected back in London this week from a trip to the three countries.

U.S. President George W. Bush will likely need the three countries: last week, he said he would call for a vote on a U.S-U.K. proposal that would set a March 17 deadline for Iraqi disarmament. With France, Syria, Russia, China and Russia all intending to vote against that resolution, the United States can only afford to lose two of the remaining swing votes on the council.

French President Jacques Chirac said Monday in a television interview that his country might exercise its veto in the Security Council, adding that under any conditions, France would vote against the U.S.-U.K. proposal.

"No matter what the circumstances we will vote 'no,'" he said.

In the interview, Chirac said the United States did not have the nine votes in the 15-seat Security Council need to pass its resolution. This prediction flew in the face of optimism from senior American officials Sunday, including Powell, who told Fox News he believed he was "striking distance" from gaining passage for the resolution.

After meeting with the Guinean foreign minister, Powell's spokesman Richard Boucher described the meeting as "a very good discussion." However Boucher would not say whether Powell locked up the Guinean vote.

Powell has also telephoned the heads of state in Pakistan and Angola, two other swing votes on the council.

Powell's efforts may have been bolstered Monday with new information coming from the U.N. weapons inspectors indicating Iraq had developed special war heads capable of disseminating biological and chemical weapons.

"I think we should be concerned," Powell said. "It seems to me that this information on the drones, which I know UNMOVIC was evaluating, but it was information that was available last week, and should be of concern to everyone," he said, referring to the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission.

Meanwhile, the strongest ally of the United States might be backing away from the March 17 deadline. Under increasing pressure from his own party, and the first formal threat of resignation from one of his government's ministers, British Prime Minister Tony Blair's spokesman said Monday his government would be open to extending the deadline.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: seccouncilvote

1 posted on 03/10/2003 3:15:47 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Why are we even allowing France to meddle in our national interest. It's time President Bush picks up the phone ......and explains to Chirac what we will do to his third world country if he doesn't stop working against us...

Call him out.......and lets end this stupid little game that is wasting time......we could lose American lives if this farce continues much longer...cripe we are in the middle of sandstorm weather in Iraq.

Enough is Enough!!!!

2 posted on 03/10/2003 3:21:40 PM PST by Dog (Courage is being scared to death... and saddling up anyway. ~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
This is pathetic. Bush begging Guinea to allow us to go to war.
3 posted on 03/10/2003 3:21:52 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Yep.....when did it matter.

Meanwhile, the strongest ally of the United States might be backing away from the March 17 deadline. Under increasing pressure from his own party, and the first formal threat of resignation from one of his government's ministers, British Prime Minister Tony Blair's spokesman said Monday his government would be open to extending the deadline.

Blair is going wobbly...

4 posted on 03/10/2003 3:23:59 PM PST by Dog (Courage is being scared to death... and saddling up anyway. ~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
C'mon, GW, GET A PAIR!! Originally, you were giving the UN a chance to be relevant. You are now guilty of doing for the UN what the UN is guilty of doing for Iraq: Chance after chance after chance.
5 posted on 03/10/2003 3:25:04 PM PST by whadizit (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I think that Bush is stalling for time to get the troops in place in Turkey. The drones and missles that can spray bio weapons are very serious. An all out massive attack is required to minimize that threat. the french are as relevant here as they are pathetic in battle.
6 posted on 03/10/2003 3:30:04 PM PST by Rockiesrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Freep THE WORM here...
7 posted on 03/10/2003 3:32:44 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
I don't care for Sen. John McCain's politics, but ya can't deny his patriotism:

"France is like an aging actress out of the 1940's. She's still dining out on her looks, but doesn't have the face for it."

As quoted in Newsweek.
8 posted on 03/10/2003 3:59:24 PM PST by uncbuck (Sen Lawyers, Guns and Money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

French battle flag

9 posted on 03/10/2003 4:01:53 PM PST by aomagrat (IYAOYAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Text of my message to the worm. I had to borrow a line from Dennis Miller...it seemed appropriate: Dear Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkey,

When the radical Islamo-fascists over-run your country in the coming decade you will need your already ample supply of white flags to surrender, because the "arrogant" Americans will not lift a finger to help you again. In our "arrogance", the biggest mistake we made was allowing the blood from our solders to soak your beaches while they liberated your cowardly asses.

Regards,

Your Former Best Friends...The United States of America.

P.S. Thanks for the nice statue you gave us a century ago that graces New York City, even though it took our people a month to chisel of the armpit hair.

10 posted on 03/10/2003 4:07:19 PM PST by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
A REAL president would not even consider the anti-American, anti-Semitic UN!

Begging for votes is not something a powerful nation does.

11 posted on 03/10/2003 6:28:51 PM PST by nonliberal (Taglines? We don't need no stinkin' taglines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
I hesitate to think the amount of our taxpayers money being offered to bribe these African dictators for their UN Vote. What difference does it make whether any of these countries vote with us or against us. For certain, he should not be offering any kind of immigration concessions to the Mexicans as blackmail for their vote. GWB should just call for the vote and let the chips fall where they may and proceed on to victory over Saddam.
12 posted on 03/10/2003 6:34:51 PM PST by brydic1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson