Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jimmyclyde
To search or not to search, that is the question...
2 posted on 03/10/2003 9:14:27 AM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RoughDobermann
Boy is he DUMB! Hasn't he heard Iraq HAS NO chemical weapons.
15 posted on 03/10/2003 10:20:14 AM PST by Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RoughDobermann
I made this comment on the other thread regarding this issue:


SOLDIER'S CHILLING WARNING

Posted by EODGUY to maquiladora
On News/Activism 03/10/2003 11:04 PM CST #96 of 96

I haven't read all the comments, so if my hypothesis has already been made, I apologize.

Is it possible that this military officer was "allowed" to defect and provide the info he did in order to stimulate even more anti-war sentiment and anti-Bush action around the world?

Having been in our military, I question how disguising the officer for the interview to protect his family in Iraq would make any sense. Unless accountability is much more relaxed in the Iraqi military, it should be relatively easy to identify an officer who is absent from his assigned duty position.

I know it sounds a little like a tinfoil hat comment, but the entire situation has a strange odor about it.

26 posted on 03/10/2003 9:09:18 PM PST by EODGUY (This guy's comments are made to order for the anti-military action/anti-Bush crowd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson