To: Jimmyclyde
To
search or not to search, that is the question...
To: RoughDobermann
Boy is he DUMB! Hasn't he heard Iraq HAS NO chemical weapons.
15 posted on
03/10/2003 10:20:14 AM PST by
Warren
To: RoughDobermann
I made this comment on the other thread regarding this issue:
SOLDIER'S CHILLING WARNING
Posted by EODGUY to maquiladora
On News/Activism 03/10/2003 11:04 PM CST #96 of 96
I haven't read all the comments, so if my hypothesis has already been made, I apologize.
Is it possible that this military officer was "allowed" to defect and provide the info he did in order to stimulate even more anti-war sentiment and anti-Bush action around the world?
Having been in our military, I question how disguising the officer for the interview to protect his family in Iraq would make any sense. Unless accountability is much more relaxed in the Iraqi military, it should be relatively easy to identify an officer who is absent from his assigned duty position.
I know it sounds a little like a tinfoil hat comment, but the entire situation has a strange odor about it.
26 posted on
03/10/2003 9:09:18 PM PST by
EODGUY
(This guy's comments are made to order for the anti-military action/anti-Bush crowd.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson