To: ksen
So I don't see the urgency to save a poor disabled vet who is sitting on a $Million plus. I think this is one of those Libertarian "theory" issues.
37 posted on
03/10/2003 6:43:32 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
To: AppyPappy
You seem to be overly obsessed with money. Possibly you are the one living in squalor.
38 posted on
03/10/2003 6:46:14 AM PST by
TonyWojo
To: TonyWojo; AppyPappy
Possibly you are the one living in squalor. I think you're on to something Tony. My guess is AP is that posting from communist China. They all live in squalor over there.
39 posted on
03/10/2003 6:51:17 AM PST by
AAABEST
To: AppyPappy
I think this is one of those Libertarian "theory" issues.You mean the Libertarian "theory" of private property?
40 posted on
03/10/2003 6:52:02 AM PST by
ksen
(HHD)
To: AppyPappy
government seizing private property should be the concern of all citizens, your "theory issue" may be rethought when the government comes for your property and their is no legal precedent to stop them... libertarian or otherwise.
my property is being threatened under the nontidal wetland regulations, that can delegate drainage ditches as nontidal wetlands, with criminal fines of noncompliance of $500.00 a day, and nothing for complying... accept the ability to pay taxes on property i cannot do anything with, ie farm, till, harvest trees...
fight on homesteader....
teeman
43 posted on
03/10/2003 6:59:09 AM PST by
teeman8r
To: AppyPappy
S
o I don't see the urgency to save a poor disabled vet who is sitting on a $Million plusIf I had a 50,000 dollar car and the state offered me 1,000 dollars for it, would you say I had to take it? There is no difference in this case. First, the state is only offering 25 to 30 percent of the value of the property, second, the value of the land is further enhanced by the selling of fill, and third,(and most important) HE DOESN'T WANT TO SELL. PERIOD.
155 posted on
03/10/2003 7:37:27 PM PST by
zip
(I love being right)
To: AppyPappy
So I don't see the urgency to save a poor disabled vet who is sitting on a $Million plus. I think this is one of those Libertarian "theory" issues. Some things are more important than money.
197 posted on
03/11/2003 12:25:23 PM PST by
Liberal Classic
(Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentis telum est.)
To: AppyPappy
"So I don't see the urgency to save a poor disabled vet who is sitting on a $Million plus. I think this is one of those Libertarian "theory" issues."
I don't think you understand the true nature of the issue here. The boundries of eminent domain would seem to be the basis of dispute here; not the money. The landowner want's to keep his land. The greenies ,a leftist political group of people who have chosen to disregard and destroy our constitution through the use of trial lawyers and despicable left wing politicians,communists,socialists,marxists,eliteists,and deceived sheeple, wants to steal his land under the guise of eminent domain, as they are and have been doing throughout America for many years now. The land is not necessary for public domain and therefore he should not be pushed off his land.
289 posted on
03/12/2003 5:24:53 AM PST by
wgeorge2001
(One God, one faith, one baptism. The Father,Son and Holy Spirit!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson