Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Last-Ditch Effort?Data Suggests Crew Attempted to Save Columbia in Final Seconds
ABCNews.com ^ | March 9,2003 | Dennis Powell

Posted on 03/09/2003 8:27:33 PM PST by John W

March 9 — As the space shuttle Columbia was breaking apart over Texas on Feb. 1, one of the shuttle's pilots may have attempted to take control of the spacecraft, ABCNEWS has learned.

On re-entry, the shuttle normally is controlled by on-board computers. But recovered data from the last seconds of flight indicates that one of the pilots, commander Rick Husband or Wille McCool, may have attempted to disengage the auto pilot in what would have been a futile effort to regain control of Columbia, sources working with investigators told ABCNEWS.

Astronauts are taught to take control of the shuttle when it "wanders," former astronaut Charles Bolden said.

"If Rick [Husband] sees a problem, it's likely he tried to take control," Bolden said.

If so, it would be the first time a pilot ever attempted such a move during re-entry. And it could mean the seven astronauts on board had at least a few seconds of knowledge that they were in dire trouble.

Only minutes earlier, traveling at 20 times the speed of sound, Columbia crossed the California coastline. In the middle of the state, investigators now believe, the first piece of debris came off the shuttle.

At that time, evidently, neither the seven astronauts nor flight controllers at Mission Control knew the shuttle was coming apart.

So far, investigators have found no debris west of Texas.

They have started to map out a debris path using analysis done on photos, video and Federal Aviation Administration radar data.

Based on radar data, investigators believe that a "fairly large" piece came off near the town of Caliente, Nev.

A large number of U-shaped panels from the leading edge of the left wing have been found. The missing panels apparently came from the area closest to where the wing attaches to the fuselage. It is in that area that investigators now believe plasma entered the shuttle's wing.

The plasma apparently entered the left wing while the shuttle was in a right bank.

When Columbia started to bank left, the plasma shifted direction, as well. It entered the left wheel well, coming in contact with hydraulic lines, wires and sensors.

Investigators now believe the hot plasma forced its way out the left wheel-well door.

What allowed the plasma into the left wing remains unknown.

However, it is believed that no matter what either of the pilots attempted, nothing would have been able to save the shuttle and its seven astronauts.

ABCNEWS' Mike Gudgell and Gina Treadgold contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: columbiatragedy; feb12003; nasa; spaceshuttle

1 posted on 03/09/2003 8:27:33 PM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John W
R.I.P.
2 posted on 03/09/2003 8:30:16 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W; snopercod
"A large number of U-shaped panels from the leading edge of the left wing have been found. The missing panels apparently came from the area closest to where the wing attaches to the fuselage. It is in that area that investigators now believe plasma entered the shuttle's wing."

They were missing in the pic taken at Kirtland A.F.B.

3 posted on 03/09/2003 8:32:00 PM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Hot plasma + Aluminum body = Instantaneous melt
4 posted on 03/09/2003 8:37:50 PM PST by aught-6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute; XBob; brityank; John Jamieson; BlackJack
Thanks for the flag. There is a lot of new information in this article, if one can believe it. Most of these reporters are the same ones who write "the engine stalled" when a light aircraft spins in.

I want to see what space.com has to say...

5 posted on 03/10/2003 4:10:51 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Thanks for the ping, sc.

From CBS News Coverage (Status Report 85 - 3/9/03 06:00PM EST):-

That same two seconds of "ratty" telemetry shows one of the cockpit's two rotational hand controllers, or joysticks, may have been briefly engaged as early as 9:00:01.7 a.m. That was nearly 30 seconds after commander Rick Husband's final interrupted transmission to Houston at 8:59:32 a.m. But the timing is uncertain because of the duration of software-driven data sampling rates. The final bit of telemetry, however, shows Columbia digital autopilot was still in control when the flow of data finally ceased and that the hand controller was in its normal "centered" position. As such, it is not known whether the RHC was bumped inadvertently by the commander or pilot or whether one of them intentionally gripped the stick with thoughts of taking over manual control.

-- snip --

The final bit of telemetry from Columbia showed a computer fault message regarding the rotational hand controller. While the "digital autopilot roll stick function" was initialized, "available vehicle data indicates the RHC was in detent (in the normal centered position) and (the) digital autopilot was in AUTO."
If you recall, the control stick had been 'bumped' in the early part of the film NASA recovered, and McCool had to reset the auto-pilot. I doubt that the crew had any real concept of how dire their position was from the time of LOS to breakup; those few seconds they were doing everything they had trained for to effect recovery.
6 posted on 03/10/2003 5:18:01 AM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: brityank; snopercod
You guys would be the experts on this --- I watched the digital recording provided online the Internet, and I was interested in the end of it, the degradation of the video recorder's display in the Doc's hands. Granted, she was moving around, and that may have disturbed the power to it, but I wondered if the "plasma" burrowing into the left wing, had also, thereby, violated the ability of the radio frequency suppression "system?"
7 posted on 03/10/2003 6:13:54 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
I doubt the plasma was responsible, for the simple fact that the crew module is a sealed aluminum chamber and would pretty much shield any EMI on the outside. Of course there are the windows which would provide an aperature for EMI to enter.

What I am trying to say is that I just have no idea...

8 posted on 03/10/2003 4:27:15 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aught-6
What is plasma?
9 posted on 03/10/2003 4:31:28 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Like sc, I too doubt the plasma was interfering; more likely that was the effect of the damage inflicted from the crash. I do know that if you take a spool of magnetic tape and smack it with a hammer and compress the layers into each other you will cause errors and print-through at that point.
10 posted on 03/10/2003 4:43:22 PM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
My knowledge is limited, but I'll give it a go.

Plasma is an electrically charged ionized gas. The shuttle compresses the atmosphere and literally strips electrons from the molecules thereby charging them, at the same time the compression it generating immense heat and flourescence.
11 posted on 03/10/2003 4:50:21 PM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Thanks, I think I can remember that. (For a little while) ;9)
12 posted on 03/10/2003 6:35:54 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: brityank; snopercod
Thanks.

Some of the "play by play" of data stream.

Columbia STS-107 Entry Timeline [As of 03/10/03 Rev. G] (CBS News); posted 03/10/2003 7:21 PM EST by brityank.

Excerpts:

08:43:47 a.m. - STS-ICOM: Clark: "Is that jets firing on the DAP, I guess."

08:43:58 a.m. - STS-ICOM: McCool: "That might be some plasma now."

STS-ICOM: Clark: "Think so, already?"

STS-ICOM: McCool: "Yeah, the jets are not firing right now."

STS-ICOM: Clark: "All right, it was quite a (GARBLE), actually."

STS-ICOM: McCool: "We see it out the front, also."

STS-ICOM: Husband: "That's some plasma."

08:44:09 a.m. - Actual moment of entry interface. The shuttle falls into the discernible atmosphere 395,010 feet over the Pacific Ocean at a velocity of Mach 24.56 (+30.833-167.556)

08:44:09 a.m. - STS-ICOM: Clark: "Copy, and there's some good stuff outside. I'm filming overhead right now."

STS-ICOM: McCool: "It's kind of dull."

STS-ICOM: Husband: "Oh, it'll be obvious when the time comes."

08:44:18 a.m. - STS-ICOM: Clark: "Well, Willy, I guess I could give you the camera to put out the front window."

STS-ICOM: Husband: "Here, let's, uh, no, let's don't do that."

STS-ICOM: Clark: "OK."

08:45:42 a.m. - MCC-Commentator: "Columbia with wings level and nose angled up at about 40 degrees to control heating as it descends into the atmosphere. It's altitude now 68 miles. As Columbia descends into the atmosphere and approaches the continental United States it'll perform the first in a series of four banks it performs as it approaches the Kennedy Space Center. That first bank to the right, then back to the left, then back to the right and then a final bank to the left as it approaches Kennedy and the Shuttle Landing Facility runway. Those designed to dissipate speed for the shuttle as it descends into the atmosphere toward landing."

08:45:49 a.m. - STS-ICOM: Husband: "It's noisy in there, isn't it?

08:47:14 a.m. - STS-ICOM: Husband: "OK." (said as if to tell the crew it's time to start paying attention)

08:47:32 a.m. - Editor's Note: The ICOM video tape ends at this point.

 

08:59:31.4 a.m. - Flight control system channel 4 aerosurface position measurements start trending toward their null values. This indicates worsening failures and wiring shorts. NEW

08:59:32 a.m. - Columbia is approaching Dallas, Texas. H=200,700; Mach: 18.1 (+32.9-99.0) NEW

08:59:32 a.m. - STS-CDR: "Roger, uh buh (CUTOFF)"


13 posted on 03/10/2003 7:18:20 PM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; bonesmccoy
1-"Investigators now believe the hot plasma forced its way out the left wheel-well door.

What allowed the plasma into the left wing remains unknown. "

===
thanks for the bump SC.

Doc, this quote from the main story is interesting, as we desicussed and this idea is the new photo I saw at 3AM only, with marks of hot exhaust stream along the longitudinal edge of the wheel well. Picture was not big enough to see any RCC. And it didn't make any sense at the time. It looked like 1/2 of the aerial view of the wake of a water ski boat.
14 posted on 03/10/2003 7:25:06 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: XBob
we'll prob. see the photo appear in the CAIC report... let's hope so.
15 posted on 03/10/2003 8:37:15 PM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: XBob
XBob- you did a great job picking apart the relationship between the longerons and the pathways for plasma leakage.

Looks like the CAIB is moving forwards in their analysis.

Glad to see the timelines matching our assessments from three weeks ago.

It is gratifying to see what Freepers can do when we work together.
16 posted on 03/10/2003 10:59:29 PM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Thanks for posting that. I still have not seen a timeline with the "g" values which would cause the DAP [Digital Auto Pilot] to activate the elevons. I think that is 0.1 "G", but I can't seem to find the original post. To refresh everyone's memory:
The aft RCS jets maneuver the spacecraft until a dynamic pressure of 10 pounds per square foot is sensed (0.1 G ?); at this point, the orbiter's ailerons become effective, and the aft RCS roll jets are deactivated. At a dynamic pressure of 20 pounds per square foot, the orbiter's elevators become effective, and the aft RCS pitch jets are deactivated. The orbiter's speed brake is used below Mach 10 to induce a more positive downward elevator trim deflection. At Mach 3.5, the rudder become activated, and the aft RCS yaw jets are deactivated (approximately 45,000 feet).

Entry flight control is maintained with the aerojet DAP, which generates effector and RCS jet commands to control and stabilize the vehicle during its descent from orbit. The aerojet DAP is a three-axis rate command feedback control system that uses commands from guidance in automatic or from the flight crew's RHC in control stick steering. Depending on the type of command and the flight phase, these result in fire commands to the RCS or deflection commands to the aerosurfaces.

In the automatic mode, the orbiter is essentially a missile, and the flight crew monitors the instruments to verify that the vehicle is following the correct trajectory. The onboard computers execute the flight control laws (equations). If the vehicle diverges from the trajectory, the crew can take over at any time by switching to CSS. The orbiter can fly to a landing in the automatic mode (only landing gear extension and braking action on the runway are required by the flight crew). The autoland mode capability of the orbiter is used by the crew usually to a predetermined point in flying around the heading alignment cylinder. In flights to date, the crew has switched to CSS when the orbiter is subsonic. However, autoland provides information to the crew displays during the landing sequence.


17 posted on 03/11/2003 3:14:12 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Plasma is what they call the superheated gas created by the friction of atmospheric re-entry.
18 posted on 03/11/2003 1:33:34 PM PST by aught-6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aught-6
Thanks.
19 posted on 03/11/2003 1:44:03 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

bump
20 posted on 03/11/2003 3:36:01 PM PST by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson