Skip to comments.
Powell: No extension of March 17 deadline
UPI ^
| March 9, 2003
Posted on 03/09/2003 11:18:29 AM PST by Indy Pendance
WASHINGTON, March 9 (UPI) -- Secretary of State Colin Powell said Sunday that the United States had no plans to extend a March 17 deadline and would use "military force" if Iraq did not disarm by then.
In interviews with various television networks, Powell also that a French U.N. Security Council veto of the second resolution on Iraq would have "very serious" impact on Washington's relations with Paris.
Last week, the United States, Britain and Spain presented a resolution in the Security Council seeking its endorsement for the use of force to disarm Iraq and its leader Saddam Hussein. France, Russia and Germany oppose the use of force and France has indicated that it may use its veto to prevent a possible U.S. invasion of Iraq.
Powell said the new resolution clearly says that "by March 17th (Hussein) will be seen to have lost his last chance to comply and I think everyone knows what that means... it's time to force compliances with the use of military force."
He said the United States had "no plans to change" the deadline and so far "no one (even) has suggested" that it could be changed.
There are a lot of people, he said, who would like to "see this drag on and on" but not the United States.
Powell said if France vetoed the U.S. resolution on Iraq, it will have serious effect on France's relations with the United States.
"I think, it would be unfortunate if France were to veto this resolution, in the presence of a positive vote that would pass the resolution," Powell told Fox News.
"I think France would not be looked upon favorably in many parts of the world. I think it will have serious effect on bilateral relations at least in the short term," he added.
Powell said that of the 15 Security Council members, at least nine or 10 would vote in favor of the use of force against Iraq. But to achieve this target, he said, the United States would be engaged in "intense negotiations over the next couple of days.
"A lot of diplomacy will be taking place but I think we're in striking distance of nine or 10," Powell said.
Asked whether France still veto the second resolution if nine or 10 members voted for it, Powell said: "I would not be surprised if they vetoed because they've been pretty clear that they want to stop the resolution. I don't think they've hidden their hand on this one."
He said the United States expects the French to "do everything they can to stop it, possibly a veto even, though they haven't used the 'veto' word."
Asked what would be the U.S. reaction if Saddam complied with the terms of resolution by March 17, Powell said: I think it's very unlikely."
He said U.N. inspectors have given "a mixed report" on the Iraqi efforts to disarm, "with almost 200 pages showing all Saddam's misbehavior over the years...all the unanswered questions."
"For Saddam Hussein to stand up now and say 'I've complied' ... would be outrageous."
He said that every member of the Security Council should be offended if "Saddam Hussein show's this brazen attitude to the international community."
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraqtimeline; iraqtimetable; march17deadline; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Indy Pendance
Look for a pre-emptive Iraqi strike sometime this week..
2
posted on
03/09/2003 11:19:02 AM PST
by
Monty22
To: Indy Pendance
3
posted on
03/09/2003 11:19:33 AM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: Indy Pendance
"It's like in chess: First, you strategically position your pieces and when the timing is right you strike. They're using this signal to syncronize their efforts and in 5 hours the countdown will be over."--Dr. David Levinson, "Independance Day"
4
posted on
03/09/2003 11:21:58 AM PST
by
mhking
("Bill, you ignorant slut!")
To: Howlin
heh heh heh. Thanks. It will be an interesting week to hear blix explain himself, if he does at all. I've noticed several articles today are quoting the weapons inspector's spokesman, 'huti-something-or-other'.
To: Howlin
Maybe he will bring Scott Ritter with him.
sw
6
posted on
03/09/2003 11:24:20 AM PST
by
spectre
(spectre's wife)
To: spectre
Scott's probably already there.
7
posted on
03/09/2003 11:26:56 AM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: Monty22
By the Iraqis, or Us?
8
posted on
03/09/2003 11:29:15 AM PST
by
SarahW
To: Indy Pendance
France is not an ally. They haven't ever been an ally except by accident during the Revolutionary War. Even during the Normandy landings they were already starting to complain about Americans. When the Germans were driven back to the Rhine, it was just Americans this and Americans that, and why did they have to make such a mess, etc. But France let the Americans in anyway, just like they let the Germans in earlier.
9
posted on
03/09/2003 11:29:38 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
To: SarahW
By them
10
posted on
03/09/2003 11:30:29 AM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
Secretary of State Colin Powell said Sunday that the United States had no plans to extend a March 17 deadline and would use "military force" if Iraq did not disarm by then.But, but, but...We need more time to really hide our weapons!

11
posted on
03/09/2003 11:32:36 AM PST
by
John123
To: Indy Pendance
My favorite Saddam cartoon so far...

Can you believe this guy is running a country?
Don't you need to take a class or something?
12
posted on
03/09/2003 11:40:35 AM PST
by
John123
To: Indy Pendance
It's a shame that we ended up in the U.N. swamp in the first place, but it looks like Bush knows how to get us out without skipping a beat. Every day that goes by is another day closer to the deadline. Everyone sees that we're going in anyway, so after a few more days the diplomatic pace will be at warp speed. If France wants to strut and preen in the limelight for a few more days, go ahead. It won't matter.
I think that Dominique Vilepainintherear guy going to Africa this week to lobby is a sign that they are afraid that they just may lose the dare. They may have to veto the UNSC into oblivion or look mighty foolish abstaining.
13
posted on
03/09/2003 11:57:09 AM PST
by
Cap Huff
To: Cap Huff
Click here to create two home-printable bumper stickers that say:
Only UN-Americans put the U.N. before the U.S.
Artwork and linkage by FReeper Howie. Stick them inside your cars rear window with a few bits of 3M Magic Tape, the tape will peel off easily with no glue residue even after months in the sun.
14
posted on
03/09/2003 1:35:57 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Monty22
It'll make our job easier. He'll give us a paper cut and we'll put him through a shredder.
To: Indy Pendance; *war_list; W.O.T.; 11th_VA; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; knak; MadIvan; ...
16
posted on
03/09/2003 5:43:37 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The voices of the 30s are echoing through 2003 - Alistair Cooke)
To: Monty22
I really believe it's going to happen in just one week. They told us in church today if we needed to do anything in Mexico, to get it done this week because next week, they're sealing the border. I haven't seen anything else about it ---but it was a strange feeling to hear that.
17
posted on
03/09/2003 6:15:59 PM PST
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
How did that topic come up in Church?
18
posted on
03/09/2003 6:40:17 PM PST
by
Milwaukee_Guy
(Having France in NATO, is like taking an accordion deer hunting.......)
To: FITZ
You mean we are finally putting troops on the border?
19
posted on
03/09/2003 6:42:48 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: Indy Pendance
Short-term = as long as GWB is president. Dear France, go $%*$& yourself.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson