To: borntodiefree
With your attitude, Britain, France or the Concentration Camps never would have been liberated.
If you don't think that Saddam is a threat to this country, why support his romoval?
What you need to realize is that he does have weapons of mass destruction and that he would have no qualms about giving them to our other enemies, who would then in turn use them on us.
And would you please care to share how the USA PATRIOT ACT, Homeland Security Act, and the currently named USA PATRIOT ACT 2 have specifically affected you? Please provide us with a list of how they have caused your life to change or be harmed?
9 posted on
03/09/2003 9:46:28 AM PST by
mass55th
To: mass55th
I support his removal, but it is primarily the responsibility of the Citizen's of Iraq.
I did say that if he is a direct threat to the US, then take him out. I have not seen the evidence, and I don't trust the bueracrats "intel".
How have they affected my life, you mean like the federal neonazis I go through at the airport?
Or do you mean the first piece of "Anti-terrorism" legislation used against Dianna Luppi to take her property away (www.markforusrep.com and check out the Dianna Luppi section) you can see the documents with the Antiterrorism legislation used against a US citizen.
Oh lets see what else, if the beurocrats decide any particular group I decide to affiliate or support is a terrorist organization, then I can be stripped of my Citizenship, arrested without access to a lawyer, held as and enemy combatant, and put to death. Of course, no they would never do that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson