Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/09/2003 3:30:22 AM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jonathon Spectre; FLdeputy
Hey guys get ready for a big boom. Pop open a can of beer for me when it goes off.
2 posted on 03/09/2003 3:39:21 AM PST by WolfsView (Barking from the Dawg Pound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Normal4me
Images of the New MOAB Weapon

February 27, 2003: The U.S. Air Force is developing a new, 2nd generation, ten ton large, low air burst bomb. It will replace the older "Daisy Cutter" 7.5 ton bomb developed during the 1960s. This was a 7.5 ton bomb using a semi-liquid explosive for clearing landing zones in the Vietnam jungle. The terms "Daisy Cutter" actually comes from the four foot probe at the bottom of the bomb which triggered the explosion without creating a crater (helicopters don't like to land in craters.) The probe was later replaced with a radar altimeter fuze, but the nickname "Daisy Cutter" stuck. The official designation was BLU-82 (or "Big Blue"). Until the BLU-82 came along, the biggest non-nuclear explosion obtainable was with a FAE (Fuel Air Explosives). FAE  works by dropping a bomb that is actually a large aerosol dispenser. When the FAE "explodes" it first dispenses a large cloud of flammable material (anything like gasoline or propane will work). The cloud is then ignited and huge explosion results. There's one drawback, the size and density of the aerosol cloud depends a lot on the wind, air temperature and humidity. So the power of the explosion will vary a lot. But it's difficult to get a FAE to work in a bomb larger than 2000 pounds. So the replacement for the BLU-82 bomb, called MOAB (Massive Ordnance Air Burst) simply uses more of the  slurry of ammonium nitrate and powdered aluminum.  In dry, dusty conditions, the Daisy Cutter produces a mushroom cloud similar to that created by a nuclear explosion (and for the same reason, the sheer size of the explosion creates an upward pull that sends up a "mushroom" of smoke and dust on a column of smoke). In addition to a more  powerful explosion, MOAB doesn’t need a parachute, like the Daisy Cutter, but uses a GPS (like JDAM) and an aerodynamic body to detonate the bomb at a precise area. Thus the MOAB can be dropped from a higher altitude (like outside the range of machine-guns and rifles). Like the Daisy Cutter, MOAB is shoved out the back of a cargo aircraft (usually a C-130, but since the MOAB uses GPS and higher altitude drops, the C-17 can probably be used as well.) MOAB is a highly destructive and terrifying weapon. If used in Iraq, it would demoralize any Iraqi troops in the vicinity who survived the explosion. The force of a MOAB explosion is sufficient to knock over tanks and kill any people within several hundred meters of the detonation. After the 1991 Gulf War, the United States started to get rid of it's various FAE weapons. But some were left in the inventory when the Afghanistan came along and the success of Daisy Cutters there, plus the new Russian research in FAE weapons, led to the new American research effort. There may be larger, or simply more powerful, FAE weapons in the works. But for the moment, MOAB, using pretty old fashioned technology, is the biggest non-nuclear bomb around.


3 posted on 03/09/2003 3:51:03 AM PST by 11B3 (.308 holes make invisible souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Normal4me
The 21,000-pound bomb is known as a MOAB, or "massive ordnance air burst."

MOAB. I thought that it really stood for "Mother of All Bombs".

Perhaps some lucky Iraqi Republican Guard types can tell us how effective it is on one of those History Channel programs in the future...

dvwjr

4 posted on 03/09/2003 4:14:25 AM PST by dvwjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Normal4me
They had to put off the test twice due to weather. All the folks in the vicinity of Eglin were told to leave their windows open to prevent them from being broken by the shock wave. We've had alot of rain lately here in FL making conditions ripe for sinkhole formation, hope that MOAB doesn't open up too many new ones.
5 posted on 03/09/2003 4:31:54 AM PST by chuknospam (Help fight the War On Terror!! www.operationmilitarypride.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Normal4me
The BLU-82 kills people more than 200 feet away and injures people 500 feet away

They left off some zeroes here. Should be more like 2000 ft. and 5000 ft.

13 posted on 03/09/2003 6:07:52 AM PST by e_engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Normal4me
Why waste them in Florida when I can suggest another SANDY PLACE to drop them on. It can be called a FIELD TEST.
23 posted on 03/09/2003 7:32:11 AM PST by YOMO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson